× Digital News Videos Health & Science Lifestyle Opinion Education Columnists Moi Cabinets Arts & Culture Fact Check Podcasts E-Paper Lifestyle & Entertainment Nairobian Entertainment Eve Woman Travelog TV Stations KTN Home KTN News BTV KTN Farmers TV Radio Stations Radio Maisha Spice FM Vybez Radio Enterprise VAS E-Learning Digger Classified Jobs Games Crosswords Sudoku The Standard Group Corporate Contact Us Rate Card Vacancies DCX O.M Portal Corporate Email RMS
×
menu search
Standard Logo HEALTH
Home / Health & Science

Why doctors have refused to pick up their scalpels two months on

HEALTH & SCIENCEBy JOY WANJA MURAYA | Sat,Feb 11 2017 00:00:00 EAT
By JOY WANJA MURAYA | Sat,Feb 11 2017 00:00:00 EAT

 Members of Kenya Medical Practitioners and Dentist Union(KMPDU). (Photo: Beverlyne Musili/Standard)

What is the cause of the stalemate? How can the standoff be resolved?

Today marks 69 days of a standoff between the government and doctors. The strike has deprived many Kenyans the inalienable right to quality health care, exposing many to extreme physical injuries and financial strain.

When doctors in Kenya began the strike two months ago, they spelt out their demands clearly: they wanted the collective bargaining agreement (CBA) signed in June 2013 implemented.

The government has chosen the wrong approach to end the strike. It has attempted to coerce doctors to resume work by withholding salaries, issuing sacking letters and threatening to import foreign doctors from countries such as Cuba and India.

Union leaders have also been threatened with jail sentences for contempt of court.

These coercive machinations are intended to force doctors back to work. Instead they have strengthened their resolve. After so much sacrifice they feel there is nothing more to lose.

The doctors’ resolve has also been strengthened by the fact that the government has refused to make any concessions, sticking to the same deal the doctors’ union turned down in the first week of the strike.

What will get the doctors back to work?

The answer lies in implementing the 2013 CBA.

It covers, among other things, fair working hours, improved work environments and equipment; training, research and remuneration.

Remuneration has been the most contentious. So far the government has offered an extra allowance but no basic salary increase. For any deal to stand a chance of ending the stalemate, it needs to address all the issues, and not just the addition of a solitary allowance.

Take a quick survey and help us improve our website
Take a survey

The habit of using technicalities and bureaucratic red tape to frustrate negotiations also needs to stop. And all stakeholders should be ready to come up with solutions - rather than erecting roadblocks along the road to negotiate a deal.

Ultimately, the government needs to place the interests of the public first. It is required to provide quality health care to all its citizens. Instead it has been disregarding the needs of a majority of Kenyans who cannot afford private health care.

What effect has the strike had over the last two months?

Millions of Kenyans are unable to access care in public hospitals.

National data shows that the number of outpatient visits in December 2016 was about half of the average in the previous six months.

In addition, the number of inpatients per month has reduced to less than a third compared to previous months. This shows that millions of patients have been unable to access care in public facilities.

The most perturbing effect is that many patients have died or suffered disability because they cannot not access medical care. On top of this, many people have been forced to seek health care services from private hospitals, incurring catastrophic financial liability.

The strike has also led to delays in training schedules. University lecturers in public medical schools across the country have been forced to stop teaching until teaching hospitals resume work. It is impossible to teach medicine without patients in hospitals.

This is likely to delay the release of new doctors who are supposed to graduate from medical schools this year, exacerbating the shortage of doctors countrywide.

The strike has also placed a heavy workload on private and faith-based health facilities, which have had to contend with a higher number of patients. This has stretched existing facilities and human resources, potentially reducing the quality of care.

Ethically, should doctors and nurses go on strike?

Doctors are bound by the Hippocratic Oath not to harm patients under their care. That is why, for instance, those who were performing surgery when the strike started did not abandon their patients but completed the operations first.

Secondly, the oath places special obligations on doctors towards their fellow human beings – whether they are ill or not – and charges them to take all the necessary measures to benefit the sick.

In the current strike, doctors have clearly outlined the benefits of their demands to the general public. If the government meets its obligations, there will be more doctors in public service and they will be better equipped, trained and motivated.

Therefore the burden of abandoning patients is not to be borne by the doctors: the government bears the responsibility to provide health care to the people. After all Kenyans pay their taxes to the government, not to the doctors, and should expect the government to provide essential services in return.

What needs to be done to restore confidence in public health facilities?

Resolving the current strike positively would alleviate two major problems that bedevil Kenya’s public health facilities – the shortage of doctors and insufficient equipment.

That notwithstanding, the government will need to further address the challenge of health care financing by making it equitable. Settling medical bills is quite expensive and impoverishes many Kenyans.

The National Hospital Insurance Fund (NHIF) has been expanded to cover many health care costs but the country still falls short of universal health coverage.

Kenya also needs to empower public hospitals to take advantage of the fund’s expanded coverage to grow and improve their services.

At the moment, a disproportionately large chunk of the NHIF goes to private hospitals leaving public hospitals with constrained budgets. Public hospitals provide subsidised services and often fail to receive payment for services rendered.

This means that the hospitals cannot acquire the supplies or equipment they need to offer quality services.

Related Topics

Share this story
.
RECOMMENDED