Day one sets tone for rough battle as top lawyers square up
By Paul Ogemba
| June 30th 2021
It was a day like no other for the Court of Appeal as the country’s attention was glued to seven judges and a host of top lawyers as the Building Bridges Initiative case started.
At exactly 9.10am, judges Daniel Musinga, Roseline Nambuye, Hannah Okwengu, Gatembu Kairu, Patrick Kiage, Fatuma Sichale and Francis Tuiyot walked into a tent erected at the Chief Justice’s courtyard to accommodate the large teams in the case.
Not that the second-highest court has not handled big cases before, but this one is attracting a lot of attention due to its high stakes and political consequences it has on next year’s General Election.
A look at the court would have made one imagine that the more than 70 lawyers had moved their offices.
Before the main battle, some lawyers raised preliminary issues that forced the judges to briefly retreat to write a ruling.
Lawyer Elias Mutuma representing Thirdway Alliance chairman Miruru Waweru set the ball rolling when he applied that additional evidence filed by the BBI secretariat and the Independent Electoral and Boundaries Commission be expunged from the records.
“They are purporting to respond to our application to adduce additional evidence but they have introduced new things that are not based on what we supplied. We are asking that their affidavits be expunged from the court records,” said Mutuma.
According to the lawyer, IEBC had introduced a gazette notice as evidence that there was an ongoing continuous voter registration while the BBI team had filed additional evidence on the joint parliamentary report on the Constitution of Kenya (Amendment) Bill, 2020.
Mutuma argued that the evidence was being sneaked at the last moment to improve their case.
But lawyers Otiende Amollo for the BBI and Eric Gumbo for IEBC argued that the new evidence was in compliance with a decision of the court allowing them to file further affidavits in response to the reports from Parliament.
The judges dismissed Mutuma’s application, stating that it will be up to them to consider all evidence presented before court.
“Having given the parties permission to file additional report from Parliament, the question of the other parties filing additional evidence will be determined in our judgment. We, therefore, decline the application to strike out the affidavits with the additional evidence,” ruled the judges.
As the proceedings began, the hard, serious and unassuming faces of the learned friends were enough evidence that this would be a rough battle.
But the proceedings did not lack some light moments as all the parties giggled and laughed behind their face masks.
Lawyer Elisha Ongoya at one time found himself in an awkward position when he could not remember the name of his client, and had to refer to the records to get it right.
The appellants, who include President Uhuru Kenyatta, former premier Raila Odinga, BBI secretariat, Attorney General and IEBC are represented by experienced lawyers like Amollo, Senator James Orengo, Gatonye Waweru, Paul Mwangi, former Attorney General Githu Muigai and Mohammed Nyaoga. The defending parties have assembled a team that includes Narc-Kenya leader Martha Karua, John Khaminwa, Charles Kanjama and Senator Kindiki Kithure.
Messi contract saga goes to the wire, but club still optimisticArgentina's Lionel Messi has yet to agree on a new contract with Barcelona, the club where he has spent his entire career, and his 21-year association
Restoring Nairobi’s iconic librariesBook Bunk is turning public libraries into what they call ‘Palaces for The People' while introducing technology in every aspect.
Use of police officers to enforce child custody orders declared illegal
By Daniel Chege
- PNU vows to back Raila, form coalition with ODM
By Samson Wire
- Eyes on Navy as Kenya takes tough stance on Somalia
- Grand reception for Raila as he storms Ruto’s Eldoret backyard
- Raila feted for championing unity, development
- Family pays tribute to businessman found dead in park