Ludicrous Lamu coal deal is as dirty as the energy it will generate
SEE ALSO :State urged to disband Lamu coal projectResearch from the Washington based Institute for Energy and Financial Analysis (IEFA) says Kenya will pay Sh36 billion each year for the next quarter of a century even if – mark you – the plant never operates. Yes, you read that correctly. According to IEFA, the figures were cooked to show that the proposed coal plant would produce cheap electricity. But in reality, the cost per unit would be Sh70, which is 10 times more than the investors would have us believe. There is something bizarre and daft about this proposed coal power plant that defies reasoning. Imagine building a power plant with coal hauled from South Africa to a UNESCO World Heritage Site. The so called justification was that the country has a shortfall of electric power and to meet the increased demand this dirty source of energy would supply 981 megawatts (MW). Yet, the energy regulator EPRA insists that even with 8.5 per cent annual growth in demand by 2030, Kenya can meet the entire need with clean renewable resources. Moreover, President Uhuru Kenyatta went to Paris last November and at a forum on the implementation of the Paris Accord told the world that Kenya would by 2020 be powered by 100 per cent of green, renewable energy. But why he has not cancelled this crazy, dangerous, expensive and unnecessary project in Lamu. Kenya has made significant advances with geothermal, wind and solar power that is already producing 87 per cent of the country’s energy requirements. So what is really going on?
SEE ALSO :Lobby takes on State over secrecyPart of the problem is that the National Environment Management Authority (Nema) granted Amu Power/Centum Investments together with Gulf Energy, a EIA License to proceed with the project. This decision has been challenged in the National Environmental Tribunal by Save Lamu organisation, which is represented by lawyer Lempaa Suyianka of Katiba Institute, where I am a board member. The ruling is due tomorrow. Katiba Institute has argued that Nema’s prescribed role is not the promotion of economic development but to fulfil its independent, constitutional and statutory mandate. the authority is not a branch of the Executive, but has the responsibility to rigorously analyse the proposed project’s environmental and social impacts. Katiba Institute has argued that there was insufficient public participation in the EIA Report and that only the findings were shared with the residents. Besides, the final report did not even consider the contents of the Climate Change Act, 2016 and thus ignored Kenya’s commitments to international treaties and the Paris Agreement. It is both hoped and expected that the National Environmental Tribunal will listen to Save Lamu’s appeal and cancel the licence. Yet, Kenyans must be wondering how much of a grip Amu Power has over this government that has resulted in its deadly silence on this dirty deal. Nema and the political class have constitutional obligations to put national interests of this and future generations before personal ones. Adrienne Rich once said that ‘lying is done with words and also with silence’. [email protected] @GabrielDolan1
Register to advertise your products & services on our classifieds website Digger.co.ke and enjoy one month subscription free of charge and 3 free ads on the Standard newspaper.