MPs right to reject changes to bill
By Douglas Mwale
| February 20th 2017
The bill sponsored by Busia Woman Representative Florence Mutua seeking to define what constitutes sexual offences was ill-advised.
I agree with the male legislators who ganged up to throw the bill out not because I’m a man but because I am just being logical.
The bill sought criminalise unwanted body contact in public.
Ms Mutua seems not to have knowledge of the extent to which our gathering places are usually congested.
Some places such as trains and ferries are always packed and the chances of body contact are almost assured.
In addition, the section of the bill that would have criminalised ogling would have been almost impossible to enforce.
However, it did have a section - seeking to tame sexual harassment of girls and women - that ought to have been retained.
The part that sought to ban out-of-court settlements of sexual harassment cases was a good one.
In general, the bill seemed to favour females and could have been detrimental to men and the country at large.
Time to fix mess in our universitiesLatest revelation that degrees for at least 120,000 students who graduated between 2010 and 2016 failed to meet the strict standards is unfortunate
Restoring Nairobi’s iconic librariesBook Bunk is turning public libraries into what they call ‘Palaces for The People' while introducing technology in every aspect.
Male student, 17, dies in girls’ secondary school dormitory
- Boniface Mwangi house destruction: What we know so far
- Police clarification on bar operating hours after Uhuru lifts curfew
- Nairobi marabou storks lose their home to Expressway
- Postmortem examination performed on Masten Wanjala’s body
By Micah Sali
- DP William Ruto on a charm offensive in Western