× Digital News Videos Health & Science Opinion Education Columnists Lifestyle Cartoons Moi Cabinets Kibaki Cabinets Arts & Culture Gender Podcasts E-Paper Tributes Lifestyle & Entertainment Nairobian Entertainment Eve Woman TV Stations KTN Home KTN News BTV KTN Farmers TV Radio Stations Radio Maisha Spice FM Vybez Radio Enterprise VAS E-Learning Digger Classified Jobs Games Crosswords Sudoku The Standard Group Corporate Contact Us Rate Card Vacancies DCX O.M Portal Corporate Email RMS

Supreme Court allows DPP to proceed with extradition of Okemo, Gichuru

By Paul Ogemba | November 5th 2021

Former Finance Minister Chris Okemo and former Kenya Power boss Samuel Gichuru at a Nairobi Law courts in 2016. [File, Standard]

The Supreme Court has stripped the Attorney General of the powers to initiate extradition proceedings against former Finance Minister Chris Okemo and former Kenya Power boss Samuel Gichuru.

The apex court instead granted the authority to Director of Public Prosecutions Noordin Haji to continue with the extradition case against Okemo and Gichuru who are wanted at United Kingdom’s Jersey Island to face charges of money laundering. 

“The fact that extradition proceedings are criminal in nature stops the AG from any authority to initiate and conduct the proceedings before a court of law. The AG however retains the executive authority to receive requests for extradition and to transmit the same to the DPP,” ruled the judges.

They directed that the extradition proceedings against Okemo and Gichuru that had been initiated by the DPP in July 2011 to continue forthwith on a priority basis and that the DPP is at liberty to pick from where the case stalled or to start the proceedings afresh.

Okemo and Gichuru are alleged to have defrauded millions of shillings from Kenya Power and Lighting Company between 1998 and 2002 and hid the proceeds in the UK in offshore accounts.

Following a request by the Jersey Island in April 2011, the DPP started the extradition proceedings before a magistrate’s court but the two moved to the High Court to quash the case arguing that it was unlawful and against their rights.

But the High Court dismissed their petition and allowed the proceedings to continue. The two appealed and got the case terminated when the Court of Appeal ruled that the DPP had no power to commence the extradition proceedings since that was the function of the AG.

It’s the decision the DPP appealed at the Supreme Court claiming that it will affect all other extradition proceedings they have filed against people wanted by foreign countries to face criminal charges.

Share this story
Military, NYS to oversee KEMSA operations
The authority's chair said reform efforts have been stepped up to position Kemsa as an effective player in healthcare system.
Explain legal basis of mass sacking at KEMSA - Senate
The senate further requested the Health Committee to appraise it on the compensation package per cadre of the affected employees