Your are here  » Home   » Business Beat

Kenya’s standoff with US bad for economy

Updated Tue, October 6th 2009 at 00:00 GMT +3

By Morris Aron

Roman author Pliny once wrote: 'Experience is the best teacher of all things." This silent rule probably holds true most of the time except, for some strange reason, when applied to Kenya’s economic managers.

Uhuru’s begging mission — on behalf of Treasury— to the World Bank is also clearly at odds with the war drums aimed at America by President Kibaki’s administration over President Barack Obama’s threat to ban 15 ministers from his country. While most in Treasury publicly deny the gravity of Kenya’s sudden dependence on donors, behind the scenes they do admit that in the face of the drought, energy shortages and famine, the Government’s budget is severely stretched.

The country receives billions of dollars a year as support from donor countries that accounts for a substantial part of the budget for vital areas of the economy.

Finance minister Uhuru Kenyatta at a past press conference. The minister has led a delegation to the 2009 IMF and World Bank Group meeting in Turkey with an agenda that includes asking for more financial help. Picture: File/Standard

The country also needs the support of the international community even much more now after three failed rainy seasons that saw the country plunged into one of its worst droughts seen in recent years.

Inflation has consistently remained at a high 17.9 per cent, 10 million Kenyans are facing starvation, Gross Domestic Product is forecast at below three per cent, and the thinning tax revenue is having its toll on Government spending. It is becoming increasingly clear that political wrangles within the ruling coalition have put the country on a collision course with key donors.

Much of it can be traced to the strained relations between Kenya and the international community over the slow pace of crucial political reforms.

Though the squabbling is at its infancy stage, economic and political observers, however, warn that it is threatening economic growth, as donors hold back on their level of commitment to the country. In the dark 1990s, donors froze aid to Kenya under the despotic Kanu regime, due to well documented and justified concerns about the direction of political and economic governance.

Today, some experts warn the economy could become a prisoner of the fragile political truce, and that Kenya’s credit rating could dip further in the face of the row with America over political reform.

But Ms Linet Oyugi, a senior economist at the Institute of Policy Analysis and Research (IPAR), believes the diplomatic row between Kenya and the US may not necessarily ruin the relations between the two countries.

Dark economic times

Rather, she reckons that the country’s once strong economic performance has been stalled by a series of exogenous, but temporary, shocks that hit the Kenya last year, and extended through this year. The country, she says, can recover from these setbacks.

During the dark economic times of the 90s, the economy grounded to a halt, at one point registering a 0.5 per cent growth, while inflation rose to a historic 46 per cent.

Over a decade later, the country is still smarting from the impact of donors cutting of the aid taps to the Kanu government, which only ended with the exit of former President and the entry of the Narc Government in 2002.

Experts warn the diplomatic spat could drag down confidence in the Government’s ability to ward off job losses, reduce poverty and build the infrastructure necessary for growth.

But as Kenyans seek divine intervention, the economy is already in the ‘pause’ mode, with several companies quietly retrenching workers, while a number of foreign firms are withholding new investments.

Reform agenda

GO TO PAGE 1 2 Next »

Branding Voice



latest News


Trending Now

KTN News Live Stream


Entertainment News