×
× Digital News Videos Weird News Health & Science Sunday Magazine Lifestyle Opinion Education Columns Moi Cabinets Arts & Culture Special Reports Fact Check E-Paper Lifestyle & Entertainment Nairobian Entertainment Eve Woman Travelog TV Stations KTN Home KTN News BTV KTN Farmers TV Radio Stations Radio Maisha Spice FM Vybez Radio Enterprise VAS E-Learning Digger Classified Games Crosswords Sodoku The Standard Group Corporate Contact Us Rate Card Vacancies DCX O.M Portal Corporate Email RMS
×

UK paper being sued by Meghan disputes her concern about privacy

By Reuters | September 21st 2020 at 03:26:11 GMT +0300

Britain's Meghan, Duchess of Sussex speaks during a school assembly as part of a visit to Robert Clack School in Essex, Britain March 6, 2020, in support of International Women's Day. Ben Stansall/Pool via REUTERS

Lawyers for a British newspaper that is being sued for invasion of privacy by Meghan, the wife of Britain’s Prince Harry, have argued that she was content for details of her private life to be made public, citing a recent book about the royal couple.

Meghan, officially titled the Duchess of Sussex, is suing publisher Associated Newspapers over articles the Mail on Sunday printed last year that included parts of a handwritten letter she sent to her estranged father, Thomas Markle, in August 2018.

In documents submitted to London’s High Court on Monday, lawyers for the paper said “Finding Freedom”, a biography of Harry and Meghan published in August, “gives every appearance of having been written with their extensive cooperation”.

After the biography was published, a spokesman for the couple said they were neither interviewed for the book nor contributed to it.

Read More

The Mail’s lawyers say Meghan’s alleged cooperation with the book’s authors is relevant to their defence case because it suggests that she did not object to her privacy being breached as long as she approved of what was being published.

The paper argues that its publication of her letter to her father in Feb. 2019 was justified by Meghan’s own “media fightback”, which consisted of anonymous interviews given on her behalf by five of her friends to the U.S. magazine People.

Meghan denies that her friends were acting on her behalf.

Seeking to formally add the issue of the book to their case, the Mail’s lawyers argued that if its contents were untrue, it was “inevitable” that Meghan would have sued, which she was not doing. That, they argued, suggested that the contents were true.

“This strongly suggests that the authors were given to understand that (Meghan) approved of the book,” they wrote.

The trial is scheduled to start on Jan. 11.


THE STANDARD INSIDER

Read More

Feedback