Sexual Offences Bill was in bad taste
By The Standard | February 17th 2017
The Sexual Offences (Amendment) Bill 2016 met resistance in Parliament on Tuesday this week when male MPs ganged up to block its passage.
But while the Bill specifically sought to protect girls from sexual harassment, it was couched in such obfuscation it was difficult to draw the line between say, accidental body contact between members of the opposite sex in public transport and a deliberate indecent action.
Indeed, the rejection did not come as a surprise because aside from the element of mischief so apparent in the Bill, it targeted to punish the boy child.
The rule on indecency in dressing failed to take into account some cultural norms as some MPs rightly argued. This would therefore have antagonised whole sections on the matter of dressing where no part of the body except the hands, feet and face is exposed.
This Bill should be redrawn so as to take into consideration opposing views, and not just aim to punish one gender.
Uhuru allies play safe after surprise BBI judgement
- Wasted in jail, confused in freedom
- Why Covid-19 fourth wave will be lethal
HEALTH & SCIENCE
- What you need to know about the Juja by-election
- Ruto, Raila and Matiang’i lock horns in Bonchari by-election
- Quick facts on the Bonchari by-election