Blow to Onyango Oloo as court upholds his impeachment
SEE ALSO :Nyong'o nominates 14 new chief officersHe averred that his impeachment was marked by a series of breaches of the law prayed the court to overturn the assembly’s decision. He was also fighting for the reinstatement of the benefits, allowances and privileges that he enjoyed as Speaker. Oloo had also claimed that Oraro’s election contravened the provisions of Article 178 (1) of the Constitution, arguing that Oraro is a sitting member of the county assembly. In the course of the proceedings, the County Assembly had asked the court to dismiss the suit. It argued the decision to impeach Oloo was made by the House Business Committee before it was communicated to MCAs for debate. Mr Oraro said Oloo was given a chance to defend himself by the assembly but failed to appear before it.
SEE ALSO :Assembly disowns Kibos on pollutionOraro explained that Oloo admitted he knew about the notice of the impeachment motion but ignored it. Chronology Speaker Onyango Oloo was impeached on September 19, 2019, after being accused of abuse of office, unlawful suspension of MCAs, and being linked to Sh2.5 billion Lake Basin Development Authority Kisumu Mall scandal. On September 18, 2019, the anti-riot police dispersed a section of MCAs who had ganged up with some members of the public to block Oloo from entering his office. On that day, he told KTN News by then that he would not seek intervention from the corridors of justice because as far as he was concerned; no court order was barring him from accessing his office as a substantive speaker.
SEE ALSO :Ward reps want key hospital be freedOn October 2, 2019, Mr Oloo moved to court to challenge his ouster. In the application filed under a certificate of urgency, he sought six orders including stopping the county assembly from implementing the impeachment. He also petitioned the Labour and Employment Court to issue orders reinstating him as speaker pending the hearing and determination of his application. The county assembly, on the other hand, filed a counterpetition seeking to compel him to return county assets in his possession, including motor vehicles. His defence team on October 24, 2019, argued that he made attempt to issue a response but was barred from accessing the County Assembly by "hooligans". In his defence, Muga Apondi and Carlos Omondi testified before court and stated that the MCAs impeached him irregularly. The duo averred that Mr Oloo’s rights were violated and that he was not accorded time to respond to the allegations. Acting Speaker Elisha Oraro later filed an affidavit and said that Oloo’s impeachment was lawful. He argued that the decision was made by the House Business Committee before it was communicated to the MCAs for debate.
Do not miss out on the latest news. Join the Standard Digital Telegram channel HERE.