‘Old money’ and ‘new money’ fight as winds of revolution fill the air
France replaying?It is additionally baffling when senior State officials accuse the State of being at war with its people. There appears to be combinations of three worrying characteristics that are similar to those of pre-Revolutionary France. First; there are perceptions of over taxed commoners. Second, the gentry overspend public resources, without corresponding income, and plunge the country into deep debts. mzungu-only secondary schools where they were properly oriented to speak English with proper diction, nuances, and intonations. This generation of independence “old money” gentry consolidated colonial structures and mentality so well that it was accused of pandering to neo-colonialism which meant that, although they became individually rich, they did not add to real national wealth. It became subject to castigation by social critics such as musician Joseph Kamaru. Since “old money” gentry still runs the country, in its perceived interests, there is socio-political dissonance partly because “new money” men want to bulldoze themselves into acceptance as gentry.
They rule the world
SEE ALSO :Few options left to Rotich on taxesIt runs the country in part because its children, the next generation of “old money” gentry, took control of national institutions. Occasionally they quarrel as to who is more “radical” or “gentry” than the others and accommodate a few “new money” players. This new money clique tends to be innovative in business, finance, and entrepreneurship. Although members try to ingratiate themselves to sections of old money, they lack the British cultural finesse. These make financial and business waves with political implications despite their pedigree shortcomings. It became impossible to ignore such bulldozers into the gentry club because they wield media or financial clout. They are tolerated intruders as long as they keep their social distance. Some old money players adopted a raiding mentality and pauperization strategy that ended up depleting national wealth. They became extremely rich as individuals while pauperizing institutions and perceived rivals. In the 1980s, members of old money fought each other and even encouraged selected non-gentry to acquire money in strange ways. Among the strange ways was the export and receiving of “rebates” from the Exchequer for non-existing commodities. This went hand in hand with the destruction of wealth producing activities like cotton, coffee, pyrethrum, tea, and nascent manufacturing industries. In turn, the destruction of wealth creation affected and tended to pauperize targeted members of “old money” gentry who then went into rebellion hence the “Second Liberation.” The Second Liberation, a feud among the gentry, hoodwinked Wanjiku into thinking she was liberated. New money men came up, and Wanjiku found herself, caught in-between old money gentry and new money gentry. She is in the same position as she was in the late 1980s and early 1990s in which members of the old and the new money keep trading accusations as to who, among the competing gentry, is making the country poorer than the other. As a result, there is increasing talk of Third Liberation. It is still about old money and new money gentry, competing. Prof Munene teaches History and International Relations at USIU
Register to advertise your products & services on our classifieds website Digger.co.ke and enjoy one month subscription free of charge and 3 free ads on the Standard newspaper.