survey
Echoes from the past: The unique bells of Kilifi Next Story
Kilifi boda boda riders protest against police Previous Story
Today's Paper
You are here  » Home   » Coast

Court of Appeal allows KDF to appeal acquittal of former naval "deserters"

By Willis Oketch | Published Sat, October 13th 2018 at 00:00, Updated October 12th 2018 at 22:11 GMT +3

The Court of Appeal has allowed the State to appeal the acquittal of 26 former Navy soldiers by the High Court in 2015 a year after they were convicted by a court martial to life in prison for desertion.

The former soldiers have been contesting the State’s intention to appeal, arguing that the law it seeks to depend on was not in existence when they were freed.

ALSO READ: Law outlaws people’s images on currency

The Kenya Defence Forces (KDF) has been attempting to rely on the amended version of the Act which enables it to appeal the acquittal. Before last year the Act did not allow such an appeal.

But yesterday, the Court of Appeal ruled that even without relying on the amended Act, KDF has a right of appeal under the 2010 constitution.

The 26 were charged before the court martial with deserting to work for US security firms in Kuwait, Afghanistan and Iraq and convicted to life in prison. On August 21, 2015 Justice Martin Muya overturned the conviction and sentences, saying the charges at the court martial and subsequent conviction were factually wrong for stating that the former soldiers deserted during “war time” and freed them.

The State has since tried to overturn Justice Muya’s judgment, including seeking court orders to have the former soldiers returned to prison pending the outcome of the appeal.

KDF had also tried to rely on the amendment to strengthen its appeal which was opposed by the former soldiers. 

Stay informed while on the go by subscribing to the Standard Group SMS service. Text the word 'NEWS' to 22840.

The judges found that KDF had a right to appeal as was provided in the Constitution despite the amendment of KDF Act 2016 .

The ex-soldiers, represented by a battery of lawyers, had argued that since the KDF Act was amended in 2016 after the ex-soldiers had been acquitted, there was no way they could be subjected to the new Act which was not in existence by then.

"This right is not derived from the 2016 amendment to KDF Act, because we agree the said amendment cannot operate retroactively, but because the right was endowed by the constitution which expressly forbids discrimination and the same is not outlawed by any statute,” the judges said.

ALSO READ: Judge throws out Nanok's defamation case against EACC

They ruled that since the appeal by KDF raised matters of public interest, it would be unfair for the court to close its eyes because the issue of whether the judgment in question was a nullity is for the bench sitting on the appeal to determine.

“One of the most important fundamental rights introduced by the 2010 Constitution is the right against discrimination as espoused under article 27. This article decrees equality of all persons before the law and the right to equal benefit of the law," the judges said.


Would you like to get published on Standard Media websites? You can now email us breaking news, story ideas, human interest articles or interesting videos on: [email protected]

RECOMMENDED