survey
VAT on fuel a good example of conspiracy against middle class Next Story
You shouldn't pay more for your choice tipple Previous Story
Today's Paper
You are here  » Home   » Commentary

Why government should suspend VAT on fuel

By Paul Theuri | Published Mon, September 10th 2018 at 19:20, Updated September 10th 2018 at 19:23 GMT +3

VAT on fuel was a key financial condition prescribed by IMF, so as to improve domestic revenue and tame the mounting public debt which is now at 57 per cent of GDP.

High debt level is an impediment to growth since most of the revenue collected is going to pay both domestic and foreign debts.

ALSO READ: Fuel levy a slap in the face of poor Kenyans amid State largesse

A 16 per cent levy on retail pump price which was already above Sh113 per litre will trigger harmful inflationary impact across the entire economy.

The prices of petrol, diesel and kerosene are already high and adding more taxes on this will make the cost of living more difficult

If the Government must raise more revenue from petroleum it should use the excise duty option not the VAT option.

Excise duty unlike VAT can be flexible varied from products and the amount be spread over a period of time other than imposing it once.

The premise was that by 2018, Kenya would be a commercial oil producer after discovery in Turkana but this hasn’t been the case, with that, even imposing VAT from local production and refinery won't have punitive damages as prices would have been lower.

Know if news is factual and true. Text 'NEWS' to 22840 and always receive verified news updates.

Another reason why VAT on fuel should be suspended is that, Government has historically price differentiated various petroleum products because of their economic impact.

Petrol is taxed higher than diesel and kerosene the reason being, Kerosene is regarded as for the poor and for the Government to caution them from adverse effects and high cost of living.

This price differentiation rationale can't be effectively applied when all products are taxed uniformly. Applying 16 percent VAT on final pump price has a compounding effects on all the taxes charged on petroleum products. This will be a classic case of imposing taxes on taxes which is wrong.

ALSO READ: VAT disaster an indictment on our leaders

It's true we need revenue to fund our Budget and pay our debts but taxing fuel which has a negative multiplier effects won't solve the problem, let the Government widen the tax bracket and also fight misuse and mismanagement to spur economic growth.

The current debt problem Kenya is facing is not a reminiscent of the 1980/90s when IMF imposed conditions on Kenya. We have spent a lot of cash into infrastructural development which has its pay back in the future not today. If we use what we collect prudently and bring in more taxpayers, I think we will Plunge the deficit without necessarily taxing Kenyans highly.

The Government is working on reviving Manufacturing, value added exports and Job creation among other agenda that Government is working tirelessly to see its work and succeed, fuel being one of the components to make this happen, price increase will make cost of production higher and this will discourage FDI and also make ‘Made in Kenya’ less competitive thus undermining growth and development.

Fluctuating global oil prices are enough economic problems for the country. Let's not compound the problems with a homemade VAT challenge whose effect will be negative.


Would you like to get published on Standard Media websites? You can now email us breaking news, story ideas, human interest articles or interesting videos on: [email protected]

RECOMMENDED