Your are here  » Home   » Commentary

Why Médecins Sans Frontières left Somalia

By - DR UNNI KARUNAKARA Updated Tuesday, August 20th 2013 at 00:00 GMT +3
Share this story:
Google Plus


Our announcement on August 14 that we were closing all our medical programmes in Somalia sent shockwaves through political and humanitarian communities.

It came at a time when world leaders, for the first time in decades, were beginning to make positive noises about a country on the road to recovery and with a stable government.


For them, the timing of our decision could not have been worse. In media interviews, we were asked to explain the discrepancy between the upbeat tone of governments and our own harsh judgement that led to one of the most painful decisions in MSF history.

Let me try to explain. To begin with, MSF is not an organisation that comments on political or economic progress. We focus first and foremost on the health of people and their ability to find medical care when they need it. From that perspective, and based on our extensive activities across the country, there simply is no good news. Large parts of the Somali population live with undernourishment, disease and injury. They have little chance of finding quality health care when they need it.

We struggled to provide medical services in almost all parts of the country, but not without compromise. We hired armed guards to protect our clinics and staff, something we do not do in any other conflict area. Despite this extreme measure, we have been greeted with a barrage of attacks, including abductions and the killing of 16 (!) of our staff. There has also been an unbearably high number of threats, thefts and other intimidating incidents. There is no other country in the world where security risks are so high.

The many commentators on Twitter who have remarked that MSF is known to stay and work under the most difficult circumstances are correct. But MSF, too, has its limits. And we have reached our limit in Somalia with the sequence of murders and abductions over the past five years.


In December 2011, two of our colleagues were brutally murdered in Mogadishu. Their killer, who was tried, convicted and sentenced to 30 years in prison, was released after three months. Two other colleagues who were abducted from Dadaab two months earlier only found freedom a few weeks ago. They were captive for 21 long months in South Central Somalia. These two events were the final blows.

But security is not the reason we left, nor is the presence of criminal elements. What dashed our last bit of hope of working in the country was that the very parties with whom we had been negotiating minimum levels of security tolerated and accepted attacks against humanitarian workers. In some cases, they were actively supporting the criminal acts against our staff. In many other cases, these parties sustained an atmosphere that allowed attacks to take place. Nobody has stood up to say that it is unacceptable to threaten, abduct or kill doctors, nurses and other staff who simply try to bring health care to people who would otherwise have none.

Let’s be clear. “Parties in Somalia” does not only refer to Al-Shabaab, although they have much power and responsibility in many areas where we worked. We are also not pointing solely at the government in Mogadishu, which has shown indifference to the 2011 murder of our two colleagues, as the early release of the killer demonstrates.

GO TO PAGE 1 2 Next »
Do you have something to add to this story? Comment here.
Comment Policy
Style Lab By Crystal Okusa (Call me Old Fashioned!)
ALL WOMAN EP 26 PT 2: Sumaya Athumani Talks to KTN's Najma Ismail
ALL WOMAN EP 26 PT 1: Sumaya Athumani Talks to KTN's Najma Ismail
WRONG NUMBER VIDEO: This is why you may not keep your girlfriend any longer - after Valentine
WRONG NUMBER VIDEO: Why you will have to pay cigarette-debt before leaving for "ushago"
WRONG NUMBER VIDEO: "Mama-Supu" gets into fight for poisoning food