+ Post your Story

For Enquiries Chat with us on Whatsapp on 0712 538 802

News
Lancet explains conflicting Covid-19 test results
By Vincent Kejitan | Updated Jul 16, 2020 at 12:33 EAT
lancet-explains-conflicting-covid-19-test-results
Photo
SUMMARY

“A photo of a face that shows pimple(s) may be looked at differently e.g. expert cosmetic dermatologist may interpret what they see in finer details compared to a non-expert medical person or a layperson.

“The level of knowledge thus affects interpretation of results,” he tweeted.

In recent weeks, Lancet has been put on the spot after some of those who went for Covid-19 tests at the facility tested positive and later tested negative at KEMRI.

The most recent case involved 17 members of staff of St Andrew’s Turi who tested positive for Coronavirus but later tested negative when they went for a second test.

Lancet CEO Dr Ahmed Kalebi on Wednesday set the record straight as he sought to explain the conflicting results among patients.

He used an analogy of two photos of a pimpled face taken at different times using different cameras.

“A photo of a face that shows pimple(s) may be looked at differently e.g. expert cosmetic dermatologist may interpret what they see in finer details compared to a non-expert medical person or a layperson.

“The level of knowledge thus affects interpretation of results,” he tweeted.

Dr Kalebi stated that the tests conducted by Lancet are very specific and maintained that positive results are real.

Through a newsletter seen by Ureport, Lancet added that false-negative results may occur in up to 20% of swabs done especially in mild or asymptomatic individuals.

It stated that a low positive result may be followed by a second negative swab if;

  • The patient is near the end of their infection
  • The second swab was not taken from infected epithelium
  • The patient is an intermittent secretor and was not secreting the virus when the swab was taken
  • The second result was obtained using a less sensitive assay than the first one

Lancet further said that a negative result can be followed by a positive one if;

For More of This and Other Stories Subscribe to the Standard Epaper

  • The first swab was taken just before virus secretion begun
  • The first swab was not taken from infected epithelium
  • The patient is an intermittent secretor and was not secreting the virus when the swab was taken
  • The first result was obtained using a less sensitive assay than the second one

Do you have stories, videos or pictures you would like to share with the world?

Simply click on Post Your Story button placed at the top of the website


Do not miss out on the latest news. Join the UReport Telegram channel HERE.
This is a citizen journalism website. The views expressed here do not represent that of the Standard Group PLC. Read the terms and conditions
COMMENTS
Latest Stories
Popular Stories
Featured Sections
Related Stories
More From This Author