Uhuru, Maraga dispute puts our democracy on risky trial
By Irungu Houghton | June 20th 2020
Temperature levels between the Executive and Judiciary are rising. Before we see a return to levels of conflict experienced in 2017, we need to understand what is at stake, and more importantly, how we can reduce the current dysfunctionality.
A week ago, the Chief Justice and President of the Supreme Court of Kenya issued a blistering statement directed at President Uhuru Kenyatta. Key among the CJ’s concerns was the repeated disregard of court orders by the Executive, the lack of access to State House and the failure of Kenyatta to appoint 41 judges shortlisted by the Judicial Service Commission.
The Attorney General issued a public response within days. In the streets, some fellows hang banners alleging that the CJ was covering up corruption in the Judiciary. A citizen had lodged a legal petition to have him removed and a netizen had forged and shared a statement stating that the Chief Justice had proceeded on terminal leave.
There is a sense of déjà vu or what we would call “revisiting” here. Three years ago, the reading of the Supreme Court ruling on the presidential elections produced even more acute tension. The toxicity was so unpleasant that it even offended nature that September morning. A swarm of bees took to the streets, scattering heavily armed security officers, placard carrying protesters and pedestrians. On that day, it took bees to protect our Supreme Court. We knew then, as we must know now, that we inched towards danger with the current dynamics.
Malawi is already there. Last week, Malawian democracy was plunged into a crisis. The government over-reached itself and announced Chief Justice Andrew Nyirenda was proceeding on leave. It was this statement that the netizen manipulated and shared in Kenya. CJ Nyirenda’s attempted removal has been internationally criticised. At least 40 prominent Malawian and international organisations have jointly issued a strong statement in support of Justice Nyirenda.
Like Malawi, the balance of power between the Executive, Parliament and the Judiciary is hardwired into the Constitution. Within it, the independence of the Judiciary is one of the clearest principles underpinning the rule of law, public accountability and good governance. Interfering with this in any way undermines the very system of our governance. The absence of 11 Court of Appeal judges and 30 High Court judges is crippling the Appellate court and the two specialised ones. As the backlog in cases increases, it produces further delays in administering justice.
Compound this with the disruption Covid-19 has brought to the criminal justice system and the cost of the current stand-off becomes clearer.
That the President has chosen to disregard the appointments submitted by the Judicial Service Commission is deeply worrying. On at least two occasions in 2014 and 2019, the High Court has ruled that under the Constitution, the President does not have a role in vetting judges. They are neither Cabinet secretaries, principal secretaries or ambassadors and do not fall under the Executive. Taken with the complaint that the Executive has refused to release budgetary allocations from the Consolidated Fund directly into the Judiciary Fund, it is hard to see the two issues as separate.
Several impartial civic actors from the International Commission of Jurists, the LSK and Amnesty International have raised concerns. Averting danger requires the President and CJ to initiate dialogue to foster mutual respect and cooperation. In this, the President is the first among equals. His office controls the use of our taxes and the security agencies. His leadership must unlock the looming crisis. Our democracy and the nation benefits nothing from a war between State House and the highest court in the land.
Left in perpetual limbo, they risk unleashing the old adage: What leaders do in moderation, followers will do in extremes. Factional interests will drive the temperature upwards to a point that ultimately, we all will lose respect for both offices.
During the Madaraka Day speech, Kenyatta invited us to re-imagine our nationhood, as our Constitution is re-engineered by the political class. If a constitutional moment is indeed before us, we should guard against tampering with the fundamentals. It is the red line that sets Kenya apart from Malawi and other autocratic states that cannot imagine several centres of power coexisting. Crossing this line would not be a great start for our well-campaigned UN Security Council seat.
The writer is Amnesty International Executive Director. The views are personal.
Agnes Tirop, Hellen Obiri, Lilian Kasait qualify for the women's 5,000m finals
- Transport and technology in Japan: Thika Super Highway is child play
- Olympics: Kenya beat hosts Japan to register first win hours after losing 31-0 to Great Britain
- 3,000m steeplechase women trio start chase for elusive gold
Missing student found dead at university grounds
- Raila agrees to share political party billions with Wiper, other parties
- Unknown people were tracking Wycliffe Omwenga
- Fanfare as Raila meets musicians
By Betty Njeru
- Letter from Ithanga: Murang’a’s unexploited agricultural Canaan
By XN Iraki
- The four options for Kalonzo in 2022 succession