';
×
× Digital News Videos Opinions Cartoons Education U-Report E-Paper Lifestyle & Entertainment Nairobian SDE Eve Woman Travelog TV Stations KTN Home KTN News BTV KTN Farmers TV Radio Stations Radio Maisha Spice FM Vybez Radio Enterprise VAS E-Learning Digger Classified The Standard Group Corporate Contact Us Rate Card Vacancies DCX O.M Portal Corporate Email RMS
×
Kiambu MP Jude Njomo explains a point during an interview. [PHOTO: FELIX KAVII/STANDARD]

Business News
The Finance and National Planning Committee had instead recommended that the law placing caps be rewritten to give it more clarity.

A parliamentary committee on Wednesday rejected the finance ministry’s request to scrap commercial lending rate caps, a document seen by Reuters showed.

The Finance and National Planning Committee had instead recommended that the law placing caps be rewritten to give it more clarity.

The finance ministry had asked for the cap to be scrapped while presenting the 2019/20(July-June) fiscal budget.

Politicians concerned about high rates charged by banks put the cap on interest rates in place in 2016. However, banks say the move has caused them to cut back on loans to high-risk groups.

SEE ALSO: Today's Jubilee PG meeting could seal Duale's fate

In March this year, High Court ruled that the law setting limits on interest rates charged on loans by banks is unconstitutional.

The three-Judge bench however suspended the implementation giving the regulator one-year period to put in place appropriate mechanisms.

A petition by Boniface Oduor involved the constitutionality of the provisions of the banking (amendment) act number 25 of 2016, which introduced section 33b into the banking act.

The court found out that although the responsibility of Central Bank of Kenya (CBK) in setting and publishing the central bank rate is a function of formulating monetary policy, the petitioner did not demonstrate to the satisfaction of the court that the section relating to interest rate capping falls within the purview of monetary policy.

“For that reason, the court cannot fault the National Assembly in legislating a provision on interest rate ceiling. In arriving at the decision, the court gives deference to the principle of the presumption of constitutionality of legislation.”

SEE ALSO: Ruto allies in Nakuru change tune ahead of Jubilee’s State House PG

The judges found the provisions of sections 33 b (1) and (2) of the banking act to be vague, imprecise and ambiguous.

Additional reporting by Reuters


Parliament Jude Njomo

Read More