+ Post your Story

For Enquiries Chat with us on Whatsapp on 0712 538 802

Politics
Why Singapore shouldn’t be Uhuru’s model of progress
By Andrew Wasike | Updated Feb 13, 2018 at 08:11 EAT
why-singapore-shouldn-t-be-uhuru-s-model-of-progress
President Uhuru Kenyatta
SUMMARY
  • President Uhuru Kenyatta's’ second term in office will be evaluated in his ‘Big Four’ agenda items
  • The four agendas include food production, employment, housing, and health

The social and economic parameters upon which President Uhuru Kenyatta's’ second term in office will be evaluated are well set in his ‘Big Four’ agenda items - food production, employment, housing, and health. However, the debate on how to achieve these four objectives is only just beginning.

For example, in a commentary in a local daily, one politician offered two pieces of advice to the President: First, curtail excessive freedoms, which he opined “could see a country degenerate into anarchy.”

Second, that Uhuru must decide what to do and be less bothered about how it gets done. The politician cited Singapore and its former Prime Minister Lee Kuan Yew as perfect role models for Uhuru. Singapore is a tiny economic tiger in the Far East about the size of Nairobi Metropolitan.

Mr Yew was an authoritarian ruler who stifled political dissent and freedom of the press. Despite this flaw, he led a generally corruption-free government that attracted a lot of foreign investment.

According to the Corruption Perception Index (CPI), Singapore is one of the top 10 least corrupt countries in the world. Whereas there is evidence that its economic rise is associated with zero-tolerance to corruption, there is no similar evidence of association with suppression of civil liberties and press freedom.

Therefore, except for his intolerance of corruption, Yew’s leadership style in the 1960s and 1970s cannot be recommended for Kenya of the 21st century.

But we can copy the governance system of the other nine least corrupt countries - Canada, Luxembourg, the Netherlands, Switzerland, Norway, Sweden, Finland, Denmark and New Zealand, which all practice a unitary parliamentary system of government.

Do you have stories, videos or pictures you would like to share with the world?

Simply click on Post Your Story button placed at the top of the website


This is a citizen journalism website. The views expressed here do not represent that of the Standard Group Ltd. Read the terms and conditions
COMMENTS
Related Stories
More From This Author
Top Contibutors