Attorney General Githu Muigai warns court against gay unions via the back door

Attorney General Githu Muigai. He has opposed a case asking the court to declare sections of law criminalising gay and lesbian relationships unconstitutional. (PHOTO: COURTESY)

Attorney General Githu Muigai has opposed a case asking the court to declare sections of law criminalising gay and lesbian relationships unconstitutional.

Prof Githu, in his grounds of opposition filed before High Court Judge Isaac Lenaola, said declaring section 162 and 165 of Kenya’s penal law unconstitutional would amount to allowing same sex marriages and culture.

In his two-page document addressing gays and lesbians rights activist Eric Gitari’s case, the AG said although the law of the land protects individuals from all forms of biases for their sexual character, it only recognises marriages between adult man and a woman only.

“Despite the fact that the Constitution protects individuals against all forms of discrimination, including on the basis of sexual orientation, it also only recognises marriage as a union of two consenting adults, male and female,” he said.

“If orders sought are granted, there would be drastic impact on the cultural, religious, social policy and legislative functions in Kenya as it would amount to legalising homosexuality through the back door,” he added.

Indecent practices

Section 162 of the penal code defines what an unnatural offence is. Its part C says any person who permits a male person to have carnal knowledge of him or her against the order of nature is guilty of felony and is liable to 14 years imprisonment.

At the same time, section 165 criminalises indecent practices between males and it reads: “Any male person who, whether in public or private, commits any act of gross indecency with another male person, or procures another male person to commit any act of gross indecency with him, or attempts to procure the commission of any such act by any male person with himself or with another male person, whether in public or private, is guilty of a felony and is liable to imprisonment for five years.

Githu stated in his court papers that the court could not force the Government to legalise homosexuality by amending the Penal Code.

He added that Parliament is the only body meant to legislate and amend laws. “The preamble of the Constitution of Kenya is crystal clear that Kenya as a country acknowledges the supremacy of the Almighty God of all creation who is the objective moral law giver. This informed the decision to retain section 162 and section 165 of the Penal Code that criminalises homosexuality,” the court papers read in part.

At the same time, Justice Lenaola allowed six more people to join the case as interested parties. The six gay and lesbian rights activists, David Kuria, Anthony Oluoch, Immah Reid, George Njeri, Y Hussein and Jay Tirop claim they have been ridiculed, prosecuted and discriminated on account of their sexual orientation.

“The proposed interested parties have suffered not only in the hands of the State through being subjected to prosecution and persecution but also from being harassed, vilified, ridiculed, attacked, stigmatised and discriminated by non-state actors,” the application read.

Business
Premium Nairobi business community plans protest as over 700 containers held at port
Real Estate
Premium Affordable housing: Will State's data-backed action now pay off?
Real Estate
Premium Building to the skies, but at what cost?
Business
Premium Equity's Sh2.9b profit dip as big lenders feel heat