Blow to taxman as court blocks VAT on insurance premium
News
By
Kamau Muthoni
| Dec 17, 2021
Insurers said the VAT would increase their expenses and liability. [Jonah Onyango, Standard]
The taxman will lose billions of shillings it expected to collect from the insurance sector after the court blocked implementation of 16 per cent Value Added Tax (VAT) on insurance premiums.
In a case filed by the Association of Kenya Insurers (AKI), High Court judge James Makau ordered that application and part of changes to the Tax Laws (Amendment) Act, 2020 (TLLA), which lifts tax exemption on insurance cover, should not be implemented.
The judge cited ambiguity in the law and lack of public participation as the reason why Kenya Revenue Authority (KRA) cannot demand for the VAT.
“I find the petitioner has a right to certainty of law and this court cannot condone such situation nor allow the ambiguity and uncertainty to persist anymore,” ruled Justice Makau.
READ MORE
AI-driven cyber threats rise amid global skills shortage
How Sh27.8b project is revamping informal settlements in urban areas
Equity Q1 net profit up 24pc to Sh18.3b on regional units
KCB Q1 net earnings hit Sh17.8b to join rivals in defying tough times
Centum Re begins handover of 400 apartments at Nairobi's Two Rivers
Epra makes marginal hike on pipeline tariff, piles pressure on consumers
ICPAK urges accountants to restore trust in public institutions
Alarm raised over lagging decarbonisation in construction industry
Retail investors can now own a piece of mega infrastructure projects through NSE
Why AI is gaining prominence in Africa's new investment agenda
The judge’s view on public participation conducted by National Assembly casts doubts on the entire law, which gives government the right to collect more than Sh3.2 trillion to finance its budget.
The judge found that Parliament did not give Kenyans a platform to interrogate the tax law.
“I find from the way the public participation was conducted, it is possible the public was not provided with meaningful opportunities for participation and therefore the TLAA might have been passed without meeting the critical constitutional requirement,” he ruled.
AKI, representing 51 insurance companies, argued that the new VAT Act, provides that services offered by insurance firms are not VAT exempt.
It said KRA had gone ahead to invoice insurance firms.
The insurers said the VAT would increase their expenses and liability when their income is adversely affected by the Covid-19 pandemic.