State of the Nation Address' value lies in the public responses it elicits

President William Ruto. [File, Standard]

Each year, with unwavering regularity, Kenyans across the nation gather around their radios and television screens, eagerly awaiting the President's State of the Nation address. For some, it's a moment of anticipation, a hope for a glimpse into a brighter future.

Others approach this event with scepticism, expecting little more than recycled promises and an abundance of self-congratulatory speeches. The State of the Nation Address, a cornerstone of Article 132 of the Constitution, requires the President to outline measures and progress in effecting article 10 of the Constitution, which touches on national values, international obligations and the status of the country's national security. Is it a mere ritual, a yearly event that leaves the audience dozing off, serving little purpose beyond political posturing? Or is it a vital tool for democracy, a platform for accountability and a catalyst for national discourse?

On one side, opponents of the State of the Nation address often characterise it as a tedious affair, lacking substantive content or impact. They point to the never-ending stream of promises and generalities, the absence of clear action plans, and the prevailing sense of deja vu in the speeches.

Critics argue that the address has become a political weapon, used more for scoring points against opponents than for addressing the real concerns of the nation. They see it as a stage for self-promotion, where the President and his administration can boast about their achievements, no matter how inconsequential or irrelevant they may be. On the other side, proponents of the State of the Nation Address regard it as a fundamental element of a robust democracy.

They believe it plays a crucial role in upholding transparency, accountability, and civic engagement. They argue that the address provides a concise overview of the government's priorities and goals for the upcoming year, enabling citizens to hold their leaders accountable by publicly outlining their plans and commitments. By making their intentions transparent, the President and his administration are compelled to face public scrutiny. They must explain their decisions, justify their actions, and address public concerns.

This level of transparency is indispensable for maintaining trust in government institutions. The address also serves as a platform for debates and discussions on the nation's challenges and opportunities. It can ignite important conversations about issues that matter to Kenyans, such as economic development, social justice and environmental protection.

These conversations can lead to a better understanding of the issues at hand and can inform the development of effective solutions. In this way, the address can contribute to a more informed and engaged citizenry. Ultimately, whether the State of the Nation Address is perceived as a snoozefest, or a vital tool depends on one's perspective.

Some may continue to view it as a mere formality, a political spectacle devoid of genuine meaning. Others will recognise its potential as a catalyst for positive change, a platform for accountability, and a tool for national discourse. Perhaps the genuine value of the State of the Nation Address does not lie in the speech itself but in the response it elicits. Whether it sparks debate, ignites passion, or merely induces collective yawns, it serves as a reminder of our civic duty to engage, question, and demand more from our leaders.

After all, a democracy is only as robust as its citizens' willingness to participate, hold their leaders accountable, and strive for a better future. As we tune in to the next State of the Nation Address, let us approach it not with cynicism or apathy but with a sense of responsibility and a commitment to make our voices heard.