Grandparents told to jointly take care of their grandchild

Justice Aggrey Muchelule ruled that either side has a right to ensure the child is well. [Courtesy]
The High Court in Nairobi has ordered warring grandparents to jointly ensure their grandchild is taken good care of.

Justice Aggrey Muchelule, in a four-year-old dispute between paternal and maternal grandparents, ruled that either side has a right to ensure the child is well and ensure that they retain family relationship on both sides.

The parents of the minor named as NM died in 2014. His maternal grandparents named as EIK and JNI moved to court seeking her custody and to block her paternal grandfather named as SK from accessing her.

The two claimed in their case that SK forcefully took the child and had kept her away from them during her mother’s burial.

SEE ALSO :Trader takes on DCI for impounding his goods

On the other hand, SK filed a counter claim, seeking to visit the minor and also a right to stay with her during the weekend.

He also prayed to the court to allow him collect the minor at school or any other place convenient to her other grandparents’ every Friday and that the Children Officer be directed to report on the welfare and well-being of the minor in school.

SK claimed among other things that he had been living with the child before the magistrates court ordered that he hands her to EIK and JNI. He said he had since not seen the child and had not been able to know how the minor was doing at school.

The court had initially ordered that SK should take his grandchild on alternate weekend. It also ordered that NM should stay with her paternal grandparents during one half of the holidays and she returns for the remainder of the half to her maternal grandparents.

Aggrieved by the orders, EIK and JNI filed an appeal arguing the court erred for failing to take their evidence that SK’s home was harsh to raise the girl.

SEE ALSO :Trader sues DCI over 'fake' goods

Puzzled by the fight, the judge observed that the case had dragged on for at least five years. He noted that the delay in settling the case was out of a number of applications filed by the two sides.

According to the judge, SK’s only prayer was to have visitation rights.

“The appellants are challenging visitation and access rights. On the face, that challenge would be unreasonable. This is because the child’s parents died. Her closest relatives are the grandparents on either side. The grandparents on either side have the responsibility to ensure that the rights of this child under Article 53(1) of the Constitution are afforded,” ruled Justice Muchelule.

The judge, however, sent the parties back to the magistrates court in order to settle on who will have full custody of the minor.

We are undertaking a survey to help us improve our content for you. This will only take 1 minute of your time, please give us your feedback by clicking HERE. All responses will be confidential.

High CourtGrandparentsJustice Aggrey Muchelule