Act now, Mara-Serengeti must live forever
SEE ALSO :Last Minute Mara: Luxury on a budgetThe effects of such activities, warn the scientists, could potentially make the ecosystem less resilient to future shocks such as drought or further climate change. So serious is the hemming in of the wildlife in the core-protected area that the experts now feel the danger posed by human activities should be tackled on the same level as poaching. “Our work shows that encroachment by people should be considered just as serious a challenge as better known issues such as poaching and climate change,” said Dr Colin Beale from the University of York. Apart from harm done to wildlife, the research also discovered that the increased human activity along the areas bordering the protected areas is having a detrimental impact on plants and soils as well. According to the research whose results were also published this week by the journal Science, such activities along the parks’ buffer zones have squeezed the area available for migration of wildebeests, zebras and gazelles, causing them to spend more time consuming less nutritious grass than they did in the past.
SEE ALSO :Standard backs Mara raceDr.Michiel Veldhuis, lead author of the study from the University of Groningen noted that there is an urgent need to rethink how the boundaries of protected areas are managed to conserve biodiversity. “The future of the world’s most iconic protected area and their associated human population may depend on it. These findings alter our view on what is needed to protect biodiversity,” he said. According to the scientists, the situation is dire in a country like Kenya where more than 65 per cent of wildlife is found outside protected areas. Unfortunately, most of the measures put in place to protect wildlife have not borne the needed fruits. Professor Mark Ritchie from Syracuse University says keeping people out of an area to protect biodiversity is not enough as there is a need to integrate human activities and conservation outside the reserves. Around Masai Mara, for example, several wildlife conservancies were established to combine wildlife protection with income generation through ecotourism and protect interests of the Maasai pastoralists. However, research findings show that this system is breaking down as well. As the pastoralists’ economic fortunes increase through land leases to the conservancies, the more they increase their livestock numbers, which in turn graze in the protected areas. This has pushed out the common grazers except for wide ranging animals such as wildebeest, zebra and elephants. Masai Mara now relies on improved conservation efforts from her southern neighbour where wildlife authorities are currently addressing the issue on a national level. “It is fair to say that better protection of the Serengeti National Park and Ngorongoro Conservation Area in Tanzania is currently subsidizing the tourism industry in the Kenyan Mara by still sustaining the mass wildebeest migration,” states a brief by African Bio-Services. It is hoped that policy makers and political leaders across the region will use this research in finding lasting solutions to the ongoing threat to the Serengeti-Mara ecosystem.
We are undertaking a survey to help us improve our content for you. This will only take 1 minute of your time, please give us your feedback by clicking HERE. All responses will be confidential.