×
App Icon
The Standard e-Paper
Home To Bold Columnists
★★★★ - on Play Store
Download Now

Parents to pay Sh69m for Litein Boys riot damages, court rules

Litein Boys High School. [File, Standard]

Parents of Litein Boys High School will have to pay Sh49,000 each to cover damages caused by students during last year's riots.

Justice Joseph Sergon sitting in Kericho ruled that the levy was neither arbitrary nor unconstitutional, dealing a blow to the petitioners who had challenged it.

The petitioners, Sheria Mtaani and Shadrack Wambui, had challenged the fee as "exorbitant and unreasonable".


The legal battle began after school management imposed the mandatory fee to cover damages estimated at nearly Sh100 million.

The petitioners argued that the school administration was "contributorily negligent," alleging that officials failed to prevent the unrest despite receiving intelligence reports of looming trouble.

They further claimed that the decision to charge parents was made unilaterally, violating the rights of learners to an education by making readmission conditional on payment.

However, Justice Sergon found that the school had followed proper procedures. Evidence presented to the court showed that, the Board of Management (BOM) held participatory meetings involving the Parents’ Association before establishing the levy.

The court also noted that regional Public Works officers and assessors conducted an on-site inspection to verify the damage.

It also observed that students had vandalised classrooms, offices, teacher quarters, the dining hall, and school buses.

"I am persuaded that the imposition of the levy does not violate the students' right to education," Justice Sergon stated in his ruling, noting that the right to education is "dependent on the conditions imposed by learning institutions".

The court also rejected a plea to dissolve the school’s Board of Management and replace the Chief Principal.

Justice Sergon agreed with the respondents that the petitioners had jumped the gun, violating the "doctrine of exhaustion" by not following the specific procedures for board dissolution laid out in the Basic Education Regulations.

While the petition was dismissed, the court acknowledged it was a matter of public interest. Consequently, Justice Sergon ordered each party to bear their own legal costs.