Farmers want more judges for Mumias Sugar court case

"Receivership has different procedures under the law separate and distinct from the process provided under administration running concurrent. There is no binding precedent on the concurrent application of receivership and administration."

Under the law, she said, an administrator ought to take care of the interests of all creditors while a receiver manager only caters for the interests of his appointers. "The matter ought to be certified as raising substantial questions of law and referred to the Chief Justice to appoint an uneven number of judges."

At the same time, a new round of battle has emerged over the operations of Mumias Sugar days after Ugandan Miller Sarrai Group started running the ailing miller.

Justice Wilfrida Okwany ordered Sarrai to close Mumias but the firm says that her orders are conflicting those of the Court of Appeal that suspended earlier orders by Justice Alfred Mabeya. According to Gichaba, the orders by the Court of Appeal take precedent of the orders by the Commercial Court.

The new battle pits Jaqueline Kimeto against Sarrai which she accuses of starting to run Mumias despite court orders issued by Justice Mabeya cancelling the 20-year lease granted to Sarrai by KCB Bank receiver manager Ramana Rao.

But Sarrai accuses Kimeto, who is one of Mumias creditors, of relying on hearsay in her new application seeking to have the company shut down. Sarrai says Kimeto's application has an implication of rendering the whole revival process useless.