Kisumu revenue dip raises queries
Nyanza
By
Kepher Otieno
| May 01, 2019
Kisumu County Government is on the spot over its reported revenue collection decline.
A financial audit by the county administration reveals that while Kisumu has the capacity to collect more than Sh4.5 billion annually, it only manages Sh900 million.
Non-governmental organisation Transparency International (TI) now wants those responsible for pilferage of county funds must be held liable.
It cites a Controller of Budget report for 2017/18 financial year, which shows there is decline in performance of the county’s own revenue.
READ MORE
Longest beer distribution dispute threatens Diageo's exit plan
Adani plots a comeback months after losing first round in Sh258b airport deal
Why Mbadi wants IEBC to reduce Sh64b election budget
How Kenyans lost Sh10bn through shadowy investments
Kenyan startups outshine Africa with three major innovation wins
Why every Kenyan must protect their personal data
Konza inks deal with Moroccan firm to deliver AI certification
AG's office in the spot for hindering KenGen's cheaper power plan
Pesalink, PAPSS deal cuts currency barriers for Kenya cross-border payments
Manyanja Mall: Quickmart, Goodlife and Rubis among anchor tenants of Sh400 million mall
Revenue collection decreased by 12.9 per cent from Sh1 billion in the financial year 2016/17 to Sh879.90 million in 2017/18.
“These are just but one of the key challenges currently affecting budget implementation in the county,” said TI Programme Coordinator Titus Ogalo, while releasing a report in Kisumu yesterday.
Summon officers
He wants the County Assembly or Senate to summon relevant officers in charge of the various departments adversely mentioned in the Auditor General’s report.
“We want them to appear before the Assembly and Senate to provide clarity on the issues of impropriety highlighted therein,’’ Mr Ogallo told The Standard in an interview.
Although, the county adopted and launched an electronic trade licensing system two years ago, TI noted the system is not working effectively as was planned.
The Auditor General’s report for 2017/2018 queried the outstanding revenue from property rates and house rents.
Accuracy of the revenue for the year ended June 30, 2018 could not be confirmed for the rates and rent.