Embu miraa farmers demand more of Sh1b kitty
SEE ALSO :Growers oppose miraa funds useNgeranwa said whereas Meru has five constituencies that grow miraa, Embu has four and there is no rationale of the wide gap between the amounts the two regions received. Leaders’ silence “When this money is divided among four Embu constituencies, it is insufficient to construct major dams that could support irrigation of miraa. We had expected at a least a third of the money which would have allowed installation of infrastructure such as earth dams and miraa markets,” he said. Ngeranwa said he was also perturbed by the silence of elected leaders in the county who should have by now joined the agitation to demand for a revision of the sharing model. Separately, MCA Mbaka said Embu should have received the largest share to uplift miraa farming to be at par with Meru to boost the country’s economic growth.
SEE ALSO :Actors unite to nurture talentHe said Meru miraa farming was already advanced hence a bigger share would not have as much impact as it would in Embu. “We find the sharing model unfair. We should have received a larger share to support irrigation farming,” he said. Mwaniki said whereas the Embu’s share is below expectations, they would still accept and use it prudently to develop miraa farming and marketing.