Gujarati Indians repatriate cash stashed abroad
News
By
Otiato Guguyu
| Sep 11, 2018
Wealthy Indian families have brought back more than Sh5.9 billion from banks in India’s Gujarat State under the extended tax amnesty.
According to the Times of India, quarterly data compiled by State Level Bankers Committee in Gujarat shows that the billions of shillings were withdrawn between April and June this year.
“Bank officials and tax experts believe that a staggering Sh13.9 billion (Rs 1,000 crore) in non-resident Gujarati deposits have been withdrawn from Kutch banks since December 2017,” the Indian Times reported.
Majority of the withdrawals have been recorded in Bhuj and Mandvi talukas native to Gujaratis who have settled in Africa.
READ MORE
New push to promote dignity in Kenya's coffee trade
Kenya's oil sector on edge amid escalating US-Israeli war on Iran
Loan talks stall as IMF tells Kenya to brace for Iran war fallout
Police ink Sh1.9 billion deal with Co-op Bank to boost mobility
Going nuts: How Kilifi coconut farmers are cracking poverty's shell for wealth
MPs demand names of defaulters as Hustler Fund unpaid loans hit Sh12.5b
Mini-budget tests IMF austerity demands as State spending soars
State: Gulf firms to keep fuel flowing into Kenya despite Middle East crisis
GCR affirms Afreximbank ratings, removes rating watch on reduced sovereign risk
KQ picks NSE boss Kiprono Kittony, David Ndii in Board shake-up
"They are meant to avoid penalty or tax on their income stashed outside Kenya," said the newspaper.
The Government is desperate for cash and has admitted that all etiquette on corruption can be set aside - a move meant to convince the fat cats to bring the money back home.
In 2016, the Tax Procedures Act was amended to provide a tax amnesty on income declared for the year 2016 by a person who earns taxable income outside Kenya.
This was, however, not taken up and in 2017, Treasury CS Henry Rotich extended the period for applying for amnesty from December 30, last year, to last June 30, for the year of income 2016.
“Despite the extension, the uptake of amnesty has been low, partly due to concerns that when the monies are returned, questions will be raised regarding the source as required by Financial Reporting Centre,” said Mr Rotich.
Treasury said no such questions would be asked.
oguguyu@standardmedia.co.ke