Property can't be shared until couples divorce, declares court
National
By
Julius Chepkwony
| May 02, 2024
Distribution of matrimonial property can only be done when a couple divorces, the High Court has ruled.
Justice Grace Nzioko said a party seeking to lay claim on the property must attach "a decree absolute" as evidence of the dissolution of marriage.
She noted that Section 6(3) of the Matrimonial Property Act, 2013, states that the property should be shared between spouses "if they divorced or their marriage is otherwise dissolved".
"It is clear that the distribution of matrimonial property cannot be dealt with where the marriage between the parties subsists as herein as such, the matter herein was filed pre-mature," said the judge last week in a ruling delivered on an application by a woman.
In her petition, the teacher wanted the court to declare the property registered in the name of the man as jointly owned and held in trust for her.
READ MORE
Longest beer distribution dispute threatens Diageo's exit plan
Adani plots a comeback months after losing first round in Sh258b airport deal
Why Mbadi wants IEBC to reduce Sh64b election budget
How Kenyans lost Sh10bn through shadowy investments
Kenyan startups outshine Africa with three major innovation wins
Why every Kenyan must protect their personal data
Konza inks deal with Moroccan firm to deliver AI certification
AG's office in the spot for hindering KenGen's cheaper power plan
Pesalink, PAPSS deal cuts currency barriers for Kenya cross-border payments
Manyanja Mall: Quickmart, Goodlife and Rubis among anchor tenants of Sh400 million mall
The property includes a residential home in Naivasha, two pieces of land in Ol Kalou and Kijabe, a motor vehicle, furniture, fittings and other household goods.
She wanted the court to declare that she is entitled to 50 per cent of the property. The woman sought to have the division done within 90 days, and her share transferred in 60 days.
She also wanted the court to issue orders barring the man from evicting her from their matrimonial home.
In her affidavit, the woman told the court that a divorce case was ongoing in a Naivasha court.
The man, in his response, termed the case seeking the distribution of property premature.
The judge agreed, noting that the proceedings in the divorce dispute had not been made available.
"Therefore, I disallow the originating summons because it is not properly before the court or it is premature. It is so ordered and further that each party do meet its respective costs as both parties acquiesced in this litigation," ruled Nzioka.