Coca-cola wins case on claims of bad soda
News
By
Ignatius Odanga
| Jan 28, 2021
Coca-cola bottles. [File, Courtesy]
The High Court in Busia has dismissed a case where 60 residents had sued Coca-Cola Company demanding compensation for allegedly taking bad soda.
Justice Kiarie Waweru ruled that none of the complainants proved the claims.
He found that none of the bottles of soda the complainants claimed had foreign matter was presented to an independent body for analysis, hence there was no proof of contamination.
“The plaintiffs, in this case, did not ensure that the evidence, the bottles and the contents were secured and the same submitted for analysis. They also did not prove that there was contamination,” read the judgement in part.
READ MORE
Activist files petition to block fuel price hike, seeks conservatory orders
Government launches construction of 114 solar mini grids in 14 counties
Kenya's cybersecurity skills gap persists despite training efforts
Ruto's budget limbo deepens as IMF digs in on bailout conditions
German 'chemical town' fears impact of industrial decline
AI boom raises pressure for clean energy transition
How to pick the right insurance cover for your car
Push for cryptocurrency regulation gathers pace
How high-stakes home ownership dreams are shattered by city cartels
Zablon Barasa, Richard Bwire and Stephen Serulo had sued Coca-Cola Company as first defendant, Coca-Cola Central, East and West Africa Limited as second defendant and Equator Bottlers as the third defendant on behalf of 57 others that they drank the soft drink between 2011 and 2014.
The plaintiffs wanted the court to award them Sh750,000 each in general damages for allegedly suffering abdominal pains, vomiting, general body malaise and passage of loose stool.
In a 10-page ruling, the judge declared: “It is evidently clear that none of the plaintiffs has proved his or her claim on a balance of probabilities. The role of the first and second defendants is clear, it is facilitation of the third defendant’s production of the beverages. Having said so, each claim by each plaintiff is dismissed with costs.”
The complainants' lawyer, Vitalis Juma, said they will appeal the ruling.