Driver paid Sh340,000 for breach of job contract
Nyanza
By
Robert Amalemba
| May 05, 2021
A driver who was sacked by Jaramogi Oginga Odinga University of Science and Technology has been awarded Sh342,316 for a breach of his contract.
Justice Stephen Radido of the Kisumu Employment and Labour court observed that Edwin Mutanda was fairly sacked for forging a work ticket and his argument that he was being victimised because he was a union official was untenable.
“The court finds that the summary dismissal of Mutanda was fair. But I will award him a sum for the breach of his employment contract,” said the judge last week.
Mutanda alleged that he was victimised on the grounds of his being a deputy secretary of the Kenya Universities Staff Union (KUSU) and for having agreed to be a witness in a criminal complaint against the vice-chancellor.
READ MORE
The rent-a-stress economy blowing into a full-scale economic liquidity crisis
Smart Applications AI app to reduce claims fraud, up quality
Kenya's trade deficit widens to Sh1.6tr on raised maize imports
SMEs losing millions to lack of circular economy certification rules
State's new push to boost job creation in cotton value chain
Inside startups using tech to solve farmers' biggest challenges
Conservation pays: How protecting rivers has built a rural economy
Africa's invoice is now being written to those who owe it
Two Rivers SEZ TRIFIC lists Sh4.8b green building fund on NSE
Kenya Airways and Rubis in Sh10.6b green jet fuel refinery pact
The university, however, contended that his dismissal was based on his negligence and careless performance of his duties. The particulars given were that he falsified a work ticket.
The court found out that the entries in the work ticket were deliberate and were meant to claim a higher daily subsistence allowance.
Mutanda challenged the university’s disciplinary process on several grounds, including that the committee was not properly constituted because “it was co-chaired by the VC and was thus biased.”
He also argued that trade union officials present during the hearing of his case did not represent his interest in the true letter and spirit of unionism.