Blow to Kawira Mwangaza as court upholds impeachment
National
By
Nancy Gitonga
| Mar 14, 2025
Meru Governor Kawira Mwangaza at Bunge Towers, Nairobi on January 28, 2025. [Elvis Ogina, Standard]
Meru Governor Kawira Mwangaza has suffered a major blow after the High Court upheld the Senate's decision to impeach her.
Justice Bahati Mwamuye, on Friday, March 14, ruled that her impeachment was lawful per the Constitution.
Mwamuye affirmed the Senate's decision, clearing the way for the governor's removal from office.
"The amended petition dated December 23, 2024, has not met the required legal threshold for this court to disturb the decision of the Senate," the judge ruled.
READ MORE
Kenya-UK trade reaches all time high of Sh360b
Survey: Towels, bathrobes and toiletries most stolen by visitors in hotel rooms
Fund crosses Sh1b in assets under management
Last big cheque: State to earn Sh11.2b Safaricom dividend as share sale nears
State pushes for just transition for businesses in AI age to protect jobs
New legislation in green financing a boost for Kenya's agricultural exports
Kenyan firms should use endowment funds to drive sustainable finance
Digital credit targets 5,000 herders in financing push
Data privacy is the new trust test
Nyoro dances to the bank as KPLC declares over Sh500 million dividends
He dismissed Mwangaza's petition challenging her ouster for lack of merit.
"The gazette notice dated August 20, 2024, issued by the Senate, communicating the decision to remove the petitioner from office as the governor of Meru is hereby affirmed," Justice Mwamuye ruled.
Governor Mwangaza had challenged her impeachment on several grounds, including allegations of procedural violations, lack of a fair hearing, claims of inadequate public participation and that her impeachment process was rushed and marred by chaos and sub judice principle.
"The impeachment process was conducted per the Constitution and the allegations have not been proved to required standards," said Justice Mwamuye in his decision.
"The governor's claims, including her accusations of procedural unfairness, lack of public participation, and violations of court orders, are without merit."