Court reviews plea to shield judges from higher taxes
National
By
Julius Chepkwony
| Aug 24, 2023
The High Court in Nakuru has certified as urgent a petition seeking to have judges exempted from increased taxes under the Finance Act, 2023.
Justice Hillary Chemitei issued directions on the petition, placing it before the duty judge on August 30.
Lawyer Peter Okiro, in the petition filed through his colleague Kipkoech Ng'etich, says that judges' remuneration and benefits are crucial to the independence of the Judiciary.
Mr Okiro argues that a judge's remuneration and benefits are constitutionally protected and cannot be changed to their disadvantage.
This, he added, ensures judges can serve independently, impartially, and free from influence.
READ MORE
Equity Group forms team of top executives to curb rising fraud
White House rituals: Ruto's reception that included a picture at the Resolute Desk
How Kenya's ambitions to become regional aviation hub slipped
New EU rules threaten to dampen flower sector
South Sudan can unlock its potential with the help of investors
Riruta-Ngong railway line good for economy, mobility
'Poor public finance management is incentive for graft'
African leaders call for climate equity and financial reforms
Entrepreneurs to be trained on cybersecurity
Inflation edges up to 5.1pc in May amidst price hikes in key sectors
"There is an apparent risk of the judicial officers being subjected to an unconstitutional law to their utter detriment contrary to the constitutionally enshrined principles of judicial independence," reads the petition.
Okiro has named the National Assembly, Speaker of the National Assembly, Treasury Cabinet Secretary, Attorney General, Salaries and Remuneration Commission, and the Kenya Revenue Authority Commissioner General as respondents. The Judicial Service Commission was also named as an interested party.
The lawyer has requested Chief Justice Martha Koome to appoint a three-judge bench to hear the matter.
In June, the Government enacted the Finance Act, 2023. President William Ruto assented to it on June 26, and it took effect on July 1. This led to amendments in various tax-related provisions.
The Act affected The Third Schedule of the Income Tax Act, Cap 470, which pertains to personal relief and tax rates, by increasing the tax rate.
Okiro argues that judges could be prejudiced by the increased tax rate as they fall within higher tax brackets.
He notes that Section 84 of the Act introduces an affordable housing levy, requiring employees to pay 1.5 per cent of their gross income as tax. This tax, he says, unfairly impacts judges' income.
- Gachagua in yet another tiff over military chopper
- Capitation delays: Schools could close down as cash crunch bites
- White House rituals: Ruto's reception that included a picture at the Resolute Desk
- Equity Group forms team of top executives to curb rising fraud
- How Kenya's ambitions to become regional aviation hub slipped