City Hall may have lost Sh250m in land payment
Nairobi
By
Pkemoi Ng'enoh
| May 18, 2024
Nairobi City County could have lost Sh250 million in irregular payment for a piece of land located in Industrial Area.
The payment was carried out in the 2019/2020 financial year, according to investigations by the Ethics and Anti-Corruption Commission.
The findings are part of the EACC quarterly report (January 1, 2024, to March 31, 2024) published in the Kenya Gazette on May 17, 2024.
The report states that in 1993, a local company acquired the farm legally and it has developed with time, with crucial utilities including schools and health centres.
However, the commission's probe established that in 2014, the company filed a civil suit seeking orders for compensation and vacation of the land by the Nairobi City County Government.
READ MORE
Co-op Bank named Africa's SME Bank of the Year
Finance Bill will hit sector hard, warn aviation industry players
Experts: Finance Bill proposal on nascent sectors hurts growth
Panama eyes new China maritime deal despite Trump pressure
Kenya's 18.1 million informal workers hold the future of pensions
Why you will soon pay more for ugali
Global push to redefine housing for appropriate policy intervention
Slow decarbonisation of buildings, construction sector raise concerns
Growing dominance of China in African ports ruffles feathers
Kenya's flower exports now feel the heat of rising freight costs
The company wanted the County out since public utilities were developed on the land by the county. EACC stated that their probe established the County had entered into a consent with the company that owned the land.
"The consent was adopted by the court and a decree was thereafter issued. One of the conditions of the decree was that the company was to be paid Sh250 million," the report states.
EACC established that on July 17, 2020, the County paid the company the money.
"The payment was irregular since the title of the land in question had been charged to a bank for a sum of Sh1.6 billion. This meant that the company was paid yet the land was charged," EACC reported.
EACC stated that on February 13, 2024, a report was compiled and forwarded to the Director of Public Prosecutions with the recommendation to charge some individuals. They include the director of the company, county attorney, and director of legal affairs.