PCEA leaders jailed for defying court orders over treasurer's installation
Crime and Justice
By
Nancy Gitonga
| Dec 19, 2025
The High Court has jailed Presbyterian Church of East Africa (PCEA) Secretary General Rev Dr Patrick Waihenya and Moderator Rev Patrick Thegu Mutahi for disobeying court orders barring the installation of David Nderitu Ndumo as the church’s Honorary Treasurer
Justice Stella Mutuku sentenced Rev Dr Waihenya to three months in jail or a fine of Sh150,000, while Rev Mutahi was ordered to serve one month in jail or pay a Sh100,000 fine after finding them guilty of contempt of court.
The sentencing followed an earlier ruling in which the judge held that the two senior church officials wilfully violated injunctive orders issued on April 8, 2024, stopping the installation of Ndumo during the PCEA’s 24th General Assembly held the following day at St Andrew’s Church, Nairobi, during a service graced by President William Ruto.
“This court will not take lightly anyone who disregards court orders. A message must be sent to teach those who dare a lesson,” Justice Mutuku said while delivering the sentence.
“I must say that a message must be sent to teach those who dare a lesson. Court orders are not optional but mandatory,” she added.
READ MORE
As Kenya braces for Iran war fallout, CBK forex reserves hit Sh1.82t
Standard Chartered targets key sectors in new financing push
Iran-US war costs Kenyan flower exporters Sh623 million
Tea factory bosses warn new law for sector to hurt farmers
Farmers turn banana stems waste into wealth
AMAC signs deal with Uganda's Grain Council to open regional markets
Konza, Microsoft bank on AI skills to accelerate women in creative economy
Iran war: Why Kenyans should brace for fuel crisis despite State's assurance
The contempt proceedings were instituted by Benjamin Njoroge Mburu, a PCEA member, who accused the two officials of proceeding with the swearing-in of Ndumo despite being served with the court order.
In her ruling, Justice Mutuku found that both Waihenya and Mutahi were aware of the existence of the court order and nonetheless participated in, or presided over, the installation process.
“I am satisfied that the court order issued on April 8, 2024, was disobeyed and that the disobedience was deliberate,” the judge ruled.
The court dismissed claims by the respondents that service was improper or that they were unaware of the order, finding that service through WhatsApp and email was lawful under the Civil Procedure Rules, given the circumstances.
Justice Mutuku noted that video evidence placed before the court showed references to the court order being raised during the General Assembly, but the proceedings continued regardless.
“I am persuaded that the respondents proceeded with the installation process while aware that there was a court order restraining that process,” she said.
The judge further rejected arguments that the contempt had been “purged,” observing that the installation had not been rescinded and that Ndumo continued to be treated as the church’s treasurer.
The dispute traces back to a petition filed by Mburu, who challenged Ndumo’s nomination on grounds of integrity, citing an ongoing Cooperative Tribunal case in which Ndumo is accused of defaulting on a Sh7.4 million loan owed to Sheria Sacco.
“David Nderitu Ndumo is tainted by the Tribunal suit, indebtedness, dishonesty and lack of accountability towards the fifteen claimants who guaranteed his loan facility,” Mburu stated in court papers.
According to the petition, the guarantors were forced to repay the loan after Ndumo allegedly failed to service it, despite repeated demands.
Mburu further argued that Ndumo’s nomination violated the PCEA Constitution, the church’s officials’ election policy and the Societies Act, noting that the church had previously rejected candidates facing court cases.
“For instance, on December 11, 2014, the Business Committee declined the nomination of Rev. Francis Njoroge as Moderator for being a director of a company facing litigation,” Mburu told the court.
Justice Mutuku upheld Mburu’s application, ruling that the conduct of the two church leaders amounted to a blatant disregard of judicial authority.
“For the above reasons, I hereby find the 1st and 2nd respondents in contempt of this court,” she ruled.