Charges against county service board members ‘lack proof’
Central
By
Nderitu Gichure
| Dec 06, 2019
Four former members of Nyeri county public service board have been acquitted of abuse of office charges and irregular hiring of unqualified staff.
Nyeri Senior Principal Magistrate Phillip Mutua found that the evidence tabled before court by the anti-corruption commission only raised suspicion, but did not lead to proof of the charges.
“The totality of that evidence, at best, only raises suspicion. But suspicion alone however grave, is insufficient to establish guilt beyond reasonable doubt. What the prosecution did in this case was to collect information and place it before court without any attempt to fine-tune it to the offences with which the accused persons are charged,” said the magistrate.
In its ruling, the court said the former officials led by its chairperson Alice Muita, and members Anthony Muriu, Beatrice Gikaru, Geoffrey Mahinda and Shelomith Nderitu needed not to be put in their defence as prosecution had not proved the charges.
The prosecution’s evidence was that the board members conspired to hire two unqualified persons to senior positions in the county government. They hired George Muriithi and Phares Njogu as ward and sub-county administrators, respectively, knowingly that they were not qualified to hold the offices.
READ MORE
How regional project catalysed a concerted front against illegal fishing
Court again, declines to stop Sh204b Safaricom sale to Vodacom
Coffee market banks on online bidding to boost farmers' returns
Olympian Simader picked brand ambassador as smartphone brands fight for market share
Boost for importers, Treasury as shilling holds forex gains
New Nairobi Bill to regulate sale of alcohol
Smartphone brands push upgrades to protect market share
Inside Kenya's battle to wrap up China trade pact
Why dignity should be at the heart of Kenya's digital lending
Gulf Energy secures oil rig ahead of Lokichar project kick-off
But the magistrate concurred with the accused’s lawyer Wahome Gikonyo’s arguments that there was no offence in hiring the two because they were not required to meet specific academic qualifications.
At the same time, Johnson Kiongo and Jackson Thagana, who are accused of forging their academic documents, will defend themselves on February 2, 2020.