Tribunal upholds KRA Sh700m tax demand against firm
Business
By
Wainaina Wambu
| Aug 25, 2020
An electronics firm will pay the Kenya Revenue Authority (KRA) over Sh700 million after failing to convince the Tax Appeals Tribunal (TAT) that the taxman’s assessment on undeclared tax, was flawed.
Digital Box Ltd had appealed, challenging KRA’s decision to assess and demand for the undeclared tax liabilities.
This included Sh481 million in income tax and Sh219 million in value added tax for sales. “The facts were objectively gathered, we did not find any errors in the arithmetic computations and the sampling technique did not indicate any bias,” noted the judgment.
KRA submitted that its investigation process involved conducting court sanctioned searches to obtain vital transaction records at the company and at the director’s residence for examination and analysis.
READ MORE
State to shut down 25 entities, privatise others in new reforms
State, workers' pay tensions cloud function
Why the super-rich are ditching commercial property investments
S Sudan Central Bank Governor Rallies East Africans to Invest in Juba
Co-op Bank lines up billions for women-owned SMEs after German loan deal
Construction players protest state's bid to tax mining sector
Insurance sector players to explore use of AI in deepening uptake
Sugarcane farmers accuse AFA of 'siding with cartels' as prices drop
Growing demand for housing births modern mansions in Nakuru slums
KRA’s position was that it carried out a test to check on whether all sales were banked through a comparative analysis of the banking with the sales from the delivery notebooks.
Digital Box Ltd challenged KRA’s assessment, alleging that it had misapplied the banking analysis test to establish the company’s tax liabilities.
KRA said it discovered a huge variance between the sales declared by the firm for tax purposes and the amounts banked as proceeds of sales. Its investigations showed the company purchases for the 2011 to 2013 were lower than the figures stated in the taxpayer’s accounts.
The firm, in disputing the tax assessment, argued that KRA based its decision on extraneous considerations to arrive at the tax assessments. TAT said the firm failed to prove that KRA had misapplied bank analysis test and ruled that KRA did not err.
The Judgment emphasised that all bank deposits are subject to taxation unless the account holder explains why they should not be taxed.
- State to shut down 25 entities, privatise others in new reforms
- Sugarcane farmers accuse AFA of 'siding with cartels' as prices drop
- Forget miraa: Discovery of minerals stirs up Meru locals