Zuku fined Sh7.2m for illegally airing Kenyan film 'Pwagu'

Business
By Boniface Mithika | May 23, 2025
Zuku is one of Wananchi Group's flagship brands. [Courtesy]

Wananchi Group Limited, trading as Zuku, has been ordered to pay Sh7.2 million in damages for illegally broadcasting the Kenyan film Pwagu without authorization.

The case, Kadi Media Limited vs Wananchi Group Limited, stemmed from a complaint by Kadi Media Limited and filmmaker Diana Mbogo, who alleged that Zuku infringed their copyright by airing Pwagu on its TV platform without consent.

The claimants sought an injunction to halt further broadcasting, special damages of Sh2,217,951, general damages, and costs, citing unauthorised use of their audio-visual work.

The tribunal's journey to this verdict began with a High Court order on November 4, 2024, transferring the case from Justice C.W. Meoli to the Copyright Tribunal.

Despite Zuku's initial challenge to the tribunal's jurisdiction, a ruling on November 28, 2024, affirmed its authority under Section 26(3) of the Copyright Act and Article 169(1)(d) of the Constitution.

Kadi Media provided robust evidence, including certificates from the Kenya Copyright Board and the Kenya Film and Classification Board, proving their ownership of Pwagu's literary and audio-visual rights.

Zuku admitted to airing the film, claiming it acquired the content from Sparks Corporate Solutions Limited, a third party that warranted no infringement on third-party rights.

However, the tribunal found Zuku's due diligence lacking, noting that the unsigned, undated agreement with Sparks held no legal weight.

Furthermore, minutes from a June 2024 meeting revealed that Zuku aired unapproved content, undermining their defence.

The tribunal ruled that Zuku violated Section 35 of the Copyright Act by broadcasting Pwagu without a valid license or assignment from Kadi Media.

Despite a demand letter on May 30, 2024, Zuku continued airing the film, dismissing the claims as defamatory.

The tribunal rejected Zuku's reliance on Section 35(5)(b), which protects unaware infringers, as Zuku was aware of the copyright but relied on faulty third-party assurances.

Citing precedents like Kimani v Safaricom Limited (2015) and Royal Media Services Limited v John Katana (2019), the tribunal awarded Kadi Media Sh2,217,951 in special damages for production and administrative costs, supported by extensive documentation.

Additionally, KSh 5 million in general damages was granted to compensate for the harm caused by Zuku's unauthorized broadcast to its wide viewership.

However, exemplary damages were denied, as Zuku had ceased airing the film post-dispute.

Costs and interest on the awarded sums were also granted, effective from the judgment date until fully paid.

Share this story
Chaka's housing boom bets on investors' demand for city-style
Once a quiet stopover along the Nairobi–Nanyuki highway, Chaka is rapidly emerging as one of Central Kenya’s most active real estate frontiers.
New coating system looks to spruce up Kenya's construction finishes
In Kenya, developers and homeowners continue to grapple with a familiar challenge: how to balance modern finishes with surfaces that can withstand heavy use without frequent repairs.
Changing face of Nairobi's downtown as investors splash billions on new skyscrapers
Nairobi's downtown is changing, and experts believe that while the new look is good for the face value, it will also boost the returns for traders who will take advantage of the area.
NCBA: Nedbank sale deal on track as profit up 9pc
The tier-one lender said profit after tax rose to Sh6 billion in the three months to March 31, up from Sh5.5 billion a year earlier.
How Sh27.8b project is revamping informal settlements in urban areas
Kenya’s title deed programme in informal settlements is attracting investors, boosting land value and supporting sustainable urban development.
.
RECOMMENDED NEWS