Zuku fined Sh7.2m for illegally airing Kenyan film 'Pwagu'

Business
By Boniface Mithika | May 23, 2025
Zuku is one of Wananchi Group's flagship brands. [Courtesy]

Wananchi Group Limited, trading as Zuku, has been ordered to pay Sh7.2 million in damages for illegally broadcasting the Kenyan film Pwagu without authorization.

The case, Kadi Media Limited vs Wananchi Group Limited, stemmed from a complaint by Kadi Media Limited and filmmaker Diana Mbogo, who alleged that Zuku infringed their copyright by airing Pwagu on its TV platform without consent.

The claimants sought an injunction to halt further broadcasting, special damages of Sh2,217,951, general damages, and costs, citing unauthorised use of their audio-visual work.

The tribunal's journey to this verdict began with a High Court order on November 4, 2024, transferring the case from Justice C.W. Meoli to the Copyright Tribunal.

Despite Zuku's initial challenge to the tribunal's jurisdiction, a ruling on November 28, 2024, affirmed its authority under Section 26(3) of the Copyright Act and Article 169(1)(d) of the Constitution.

Kadi Media provided robust evidence, including certificates from the Kenya Copyright Board and the Kenya Film and Classification Board, proving their ownership of Pwagu's literary and audio-visual rights.

Zuku admitted to airing the film, claiming it acquired the content from Sparks Corporate Solutions Limited, a third party that warranted no infringement on third-party rights.

However, the tribunal found Zuku's due diligence lacking, noting that the unsigned, undated agreement with Sparks held no legal weight.

Furthermore, minutes from a June 2024 meeting revealed that Zuku aired unapproved content, undermining their defence.

The tribunal ruled that Zuku violated Section 35 of the Copyright Act by broadcasting Pwagu without a valid license or assignment from Kadi Media.

Despite a demand letter on May 30, 2024, Zuku continued airing the film, dismissing the claims as defamatory.

The tribunal rejected Zuku's reliance on Section 35(5)(b), which protects unaware infringers, as Zuku was aware of the copyright but relied on faulty third-party assurances.

Citing precedents like Kimani v Safaricom Limited (2015) and Royal Media Services Limited v John Katana (2019), the tribunal awarded Kadi Media Sh2,217,951 in special damages for production and administrative costs, supported by extensive documentation.

Additionally, KSh 5 million in general damages was granted to compensate for the harm caused by Zuku's unauthorized broadcast to its wide viewership.

However, exemplary damages were denied, as Zuku had ceased airing the film post-dispute.

Costs and interest on the awarded sums were also granted, effective from the judgment date until fully paid.

Share this story
New push to increase funding for research and development
Kenya and African countries are being urged to boost funding for science, technology and research to reduce reliance on donor support and build stronger innovation-driven economies.
Kenya positioned as Africa's next AI innovation hub
Nairobi’s growing prominence in AI conversations positions the country as a potential leader in shaping African-owned AI ecosystems.
Chaka's housing boom bets on investors' demand for city-style
Once a quiet stopover along the Nairobi–Nanyuki highway, Chaka is rapidly emerging as one of Central Kenya’s most active real estate frontiers.
New coating system looks to spruce up Kenya's construction finishes
In Kenya, developers and homeowners continue to grapple with a familiar challenge: how to balance modern finishes with surfaces that can withstand heavy use without frequent repairs.
Govt moves to close Sh56bn rice import gap with irrigation push
The government has launched a national survey on rice production as it seeks to cut Kenya’s annual rice deficit of 700,000 metric tonnes and reduce reliance on imports costing more than Sh56 billion.
.
RECOMMENDED NEWS