City residents to Sakaja: Slow down, we'll pay up when we can, even Kenya has debts
Peter Kimani
By
Peter Kimani
| May 16, 2025
It was delightful to see calm response from many city dwellers who have defaulted on rent for years, when kanjos descended on their hoods. I understand many have not paid rent for up to ten years and City Hole is owed up to some tidy sums, estimated at Sh200m.
It's not as much as they have stolen, but it in all honesty, it's significant. I won't add that City Hole hasn't maintained those units for a decade, collected garbage or fixed city thoroughfares, otherwise they'd have collected rent in the process.
So, the city askaris descended, causing their usual pandemonium by breaking doors and windows in a bid to gain access into those premises and pouring the contents outside. A dreadlocked young tenant said: "Tell Sakaja (the dimpled Nairobi governor who smiled his way to office) kwa ground kumewaka."
This means the ground is on fire, which can be further elaborated to mean their lived experience is pretty grim. And the lad was urging: Tell Sakaja to go easy. Things are hard, and when they improve, so will our rent default.
Another resident, who looked older and slightly inebriated, pointed to a neighbour's house. See that maskan over there, he posed, hiccupped then went on. They broke into the house and tossed his stuff outside. The law requires that you padlock the door over the other padlock...
READ MORE
Long-stay cargo at Mombasa Port to be moved to ease congestion
State reforms accreditation system to boost trade, market access
Safaricom partial divestiture: Endless scrutiny or bold infrastructure growth?
New bid to double Kenya-UK trade to Sh680b
Why blended finance is gaining traction in Kenya's search for sustainable funding
'We are coming for you,' Why KRA has suspended nil tax filings
EAC launches first regional framework to strengthen pandemic preparedness
Which Singapore? Controller of Budget downplays Ruto's dream
IMF to Kenya: Anti-corruption reforms key to new funding deal
I didn't follow his logic. I couldn't tell if the intent of adding another padlock to an already locked door was meant to secure the contents inside or prohibiting access of the defaulting tenant.