How politicised public service and toothless Parliament have failed us
Opinion
By
Lawi Sultan Njeremani
| Jun 06, 2026
Kenya’s Public Service Commission (PSC) was meant to be the constitutional bulwark against patronage. Article 234 of the Constitution gave it sweeping powers: recruit on merit, enforce values and principles, and shield the bureaucracy from political capture.
Sixty-four years after independence, that promise lies in ruins. The Public Service remains a patronage machine that is bloated, inefficient and ruinously expensive while the very parliamentary committee charged with overseeing the PSC has become its enabler rather than its enforcer.
The Departmental Committee on Labour and Social Welfare is the designated oversight body. It vets PSC commissioners, scrutinises the Public Service (Values and Principles) Act amendments, reviews budgets, and is supposed to probe recruitment scandals. In practice, it functions as a parliamentary rubber stamp.
When President William Ruto nominated Francis Meja as PSC Chairperson in early 2026, the committee’s approval process was swift, formulaic, and devoid of rigour. Public participation was tokenistic; critical questions about Meja’s suitability or the PSC’s track record on ghost workers were glossed over.
The committee’s own reports read like press releases: polite, deferential, and silent on the structural rot. This is not an isolated lapse. Transparency International Kenya’s March 2026 report laid bare the pattern: political interests routinely override constitutional requirements in vetting processes. Nominees arrive pre-approved by the Executive; the committee’s hearings serve as theatre. Public submissions are heard, then ignored.
READ MORE
Why we're blind fans of village political parties
Why Uhuru owes us restraint while opposing Ruto's politics
Public debt is the black hole in Mbadi's budget that no one wants to confront
Gachagua moots for a zero borrowing budget
Gachagua: Reject 2026-27 budget, it will strain households and businesses
Matiang'i backs talks for opposition presidential candidate
Disability leaders demand Cabinet post ahead of 2027 election
Ruto's pet projects to gobble up lion's share of Sh4.8 trillion budget
Integrity is reduced to absence of a criminal conviction, while ethnic arithmetic, party loyalty, and coalition balancing decide outcomes. The committee lacks political will and institutional spine to reject a presidential favourite. When it does raise mild concerns such as ghost workers on the payroll, ethnic imbalance in senior appointments, or weaponisation of performance contracts against perceived opponents, its recommendations vanish into the parliamentary ether.
The consequences are devastating. Politicised appointments cascade downward. Principal Secretaries, county secretaries, and parastatal heads owe allegiance not to the Constitution but to the appointing authority. Merit is subordinated to loyalty; competence becomes optional.
The result is a public service that devours 36 per cent of national revenue while delivering mediocrity. Health facilities remain understaffed, agricultural extension services invisible, and education reforms stillborn.
Corruption thrives in the shadows of political protection. When the Auditor-General flags irregularities, PSC, itself compromised, rarely acts decisively. The Labour Committee, which should demand accountability, instead defends the status quo.
Worse, the committee’s weakness is structural. Its members are products of the same patronage politics they are meant to police. Committee chairs and ranking members often owe their seats to the very Executive they oversee.
Legislative capture is complete: bills that would further dilute PSC independence sail through with minimal scrutiny. Public participation, a constitutional imperative, is reduced to a checkbox. Civil society submissions are politely noted, then filed away. The committee’s annual reports to the House read more like bureaucratic box-ticking than instruments of accountability.
This is complicity. Kenya’s Public Service was never allowed to professionalise because the political class never intended it to. The 2010 Constitution’s architects understood the danger of an Executive-dominated bureaucracy. They created independent commissions precisely to break the cycle.
Yet Parliament, through its Labour Committee, has colluded in the subversion. The committee’s failure is not merely procedural; it is existential. It signals that the National Assembly has abandoned its role as the people’s representative and become an annex of State House.
Until the Departmental Committee on Labour is either radically reformed or bypassed by genuinely independent mechanisms, the politicisation of the Public Service will remain Kenya’s most expensive governance failure.