Why court has halted Sh17 billion Mombasa waste project
Coast
By
David Njaaga
| Dec 04, 2025
High Court in Mombasa has certified as urgent a petition challenging the county government's approval of a Sh17 billion waste management project without county assembly approval or public participation.
Justice Jairus Ngaah on Tuesday directed that the application be served immediately and gave respondents and interested parties seven days to file their responses.
The court will give directions on how the application will be disposed of on December 15.
The petition, filed on November 28 under a certificate of urgency, contests the legality of the waste management contract approved by the Mombasa County Government.
Petitioner Mohamed Ali, the current MP for Nyali Constituency, argues the county government bypassed mandatory legislative and public consultation processes in approving the multibillion-shilling contract.
READ MORE
Revealed: Why local companies are shutting down
The pipeline truth: How Museveni outfoxed Ruto into ceding control of KPC
Britam takes top honours at AKI Awards
Why apologies matter as much as fixes in digital business
Saccos up push to develop new digital loan products
Africa roots for strong data systems to spur development
Farmer's Choice targets women, youth in plans to grow smokie vendor base
Inside William Ruto-IMF fallout
RBA, bourse tussle over Sh2.3tr pension assets investments
Hits and misses in Kenya Pipeline IPO as State eyes more listing deals
The Ethics and Anti-Corruption Commission (EAC), the County Government of Mombasa, and eight others have been named as respondents and interested parties in the case.
The project, covering design, construction, financing, operation, and eventual transfer of a waste-to-energy plant in Mwakirunge, comes amid ongoing challenges in the county’s waste management.
Residents and watchdogs have raised concerns about illegal dumping sites, inefficient collection systems, and lack of transparency in procurement processes.
Under the County Governments Act, public participation is required in major infrastructure decisions, and the petitioner argues the approval of this project violated these legal obligations.
Oversight bodies and lawmakers have previously flagged concerns over the project’s tendering process, prompting calls for investigation and accountability.