Group wants Sh63b medical equipment leasing deal audited
Business
By
Graham Kajilwa
| Apr 19, 2023
A public policy think tank has called for a comprehensive audit of the Sh63 billion controversial medical equipment-leasing tender before its renewal.
The Institute of Economic Affairs (IEA) said on Tuesday at a public forum to scrutinise the project in Nairobi while there are a few success stories, implementation of the Managed Equipment Services (MES) is still shrouded in mystery.
Kenya signed contracts with five private companies in 2015 to lease specialised equipment like CT scanners to the 47 county governments. It was to run for seven years. Under the 2010 Constitution that ushered in devolution, counties are charged with managing most health services.
The firms picked under the deal included China's Shenzhen Mindray, India's Esteem Industries, General Electric and Philips.
READ MORE
Why Kenya feels like 1895 all over again
Government push for disability inclusion
Groups raise concerns over Tobacco Bill
Why Ruto, Ouattara meeting is important for Kenya and Ivory Coast
Ruto hosts African leaders at State House ahead of summit
Bill for two decades of failure by football officials is now due
Amsons Group pledges Sh4.5b for hospitals
Governor Waiguru banks on street lights to power Kirinyaga's 24hr economy
Governor Nassir launches construction of Kongowea Level 4 Hospital
But IEA now says the arrangement has not gone according to plan, for example, how the funding of the project oscillated from Sh38 billion to Sh45.9 billion and then Sh63 billion.
The institute said while the increase in funding could be explained by additional facilities that ended up benefiting from the project, it should have been reconfigured to avoid the mistakes that occurred in its first phase of implementation.
The project's purpose was to equip hospitals at the county level with the necessary infrastructure, among them dialysis machines, theatre and other diagnostic equipment.
IEA Programmes Coordinator John Mutua said comprehensive consultations during the inception of the project would have helped avoid some of the gaps witnessed later.
"In Laikipia, for example, there was duplication. They received equipment they already had," said Mutua.
"The way the project is designed, you cannot move the equipment to another hospital or county."
He also cited rigidity in the project's contract, which raises the question of whether there was a needs assessment.
Extending the tender without addressing these issues, Mutua said, would further compromise the project's outcome.
A year ago, governors proposed an extension of the project for three years subject to some conditions.