A gay Singaporean man Monday won the right to adopt a child he fathered via a surrogate in the United States, in a landmark court ruling for the conservative city-state.
While Singapore is affluent and modern in many ways, attitudes towards homosexuality are routinely criticised as outdated.
Gay marriage is not permitted and sex between men remains illegal under a law that dates from the British colonial era, although it is rarely enforced.
In the latest case, the man -- who is in a long-term relationship -- first inquired about adopting in Singapore but was told a homosexual couple was unlikely to get permission.
READ MORE
Singapore considers new artificial islands to counter rising seas
New Bill seeks to allow men to adopt children
From Maseno to the world: Billy 'The Kid' Odhiambo Retires, Leaving a Lasting Legacy
Kenya to benefit from stronger trade and investment ties with Singapore
He found a surrogate in the United States who agreed to carry his child for US$200,000. Surrogacy is effectively banned in Singapore.
A son was born and is now five years old.
The man, a 46-year-old pathologist who has not been identified, brought the boy back to Singapore and applied to formally adopt him, in the hope of securing him Singapore citizenship.
A district judge rejected the initial application in December last year. But he appealed to Singapore's High Court, which ruled in his favour.
Delivering the verdict, Chief Justice Sundaresh Menon said that "the evidence has demonstrated to us that it is very much in the interests of the child that the adoption order be made".
"His prospects of acquiring Singapore citizenship could be significantly enhanced by making an adoption order, which would in turn lead to an overall increase in the stability of his life in Singapore."
But he noted that the decision was related to that particular case and should not be viewed as an endorsement of what the man and his partner had done.
The man's lawyer Ivan Cheong said his client was "overjoyed and happy that at the end of a long adoption process, the child's welfare is upheld."
"At the end of the day, it is about what is in the child's best interests."