Kenyan Media rejects proposed complaints tribunal

Lawyer Kimani Kiragu and Issa Mansur, representing the media houses, said the two entities' roles would be overlapping.

Making submissions during the hearing of the case opposing the bill, the lawyers argued that the proposed law was meant to draw back the freedom the media has been enjoying.

Mr Kiragu said: "The bodies are identical and it would be a waste of tax payers' money if the two are left to operate."

Mr Mansur submitted that President Uhuru Kenyatta failed while making recommendations to the bill as he assumed the role of the lawmakers, which is contrary to the Constitution.

The lawyer told the court that the Head of State contravened the law by assuming the roles of Parliament and Senate.

Kisumu Senator James Orengo, who told the court that Senate was never involved in the drafting of the law also represented Kenya Union of Journalists in the case. His argument was that where a law required Parliament to deliberate on a bill, it required both the upper and lower Houses to sit and come up with the law.

The senator said Senate was ignored when the National Assembly came up with the bill.

"The procedure of assenting to a bill is clearly set out in the Constitution and the Senate was not involved as it is supposed to be," Orengo said.

Orengo said the passage of the bill was oppressive, unlawful and meant to harass journalists, adding that it was unfair to set up two separate bodies with similar powers to check the conduct of journalists.

"Concurrent existence of two distinct bodies dealing with same subject but establishing different oversight mechanisms and two different sets of media standards and punishments, is unconstitutional," he said.

The suit also attracted the interest of Kenya Editors Guild, Kenya Correspondents Association and MCK.

The hearing will continue on February 19.