Let court decide fate of elderly, says judge
By Kamau Muthoni
| February 7th 2019
Parliament should consider changing the law to allow courts to decide whether or not to send elderly people to jail, a judge has said.
Making a ruling in the appeal of an 85-year-old man who had been sentenced to life in prison for defiling a minor, Justice John Mativo observed that courts should have the discretion in jailing elderly people as the compulsory sentences amounted to committing them to a slow death behind bars.
Wilson Kipchirchir Koskei appeared not to comprehend what he was charged with and gave incoherent answers in his mother language.
During the trial at the lower court, English was used and the proceedings translated into Kiswahili although he did not understand.
Justice Mativo said he was of the view that the elderly should be confined to their homes under supervision and not locked up in cells.
According to the judge, there was no likelihood that an elderly person would reform.
“I am also concerned that some elderly inmates are being unnecessarily held in prison despite the fact that their continued incarceration does little to serve the principal purposes of punishment: retribution, incapacitation, deterrence and rehabilitation. Alternative forms of punishment should be imposed – for example, conditional release to home confinement under parole supervision – that would serve the legitimate goals of punishment," he noted.
Some elderly people, he observed, were too frail to be a danger to society or even themselves.
According to the judge, jailing the elderly could constitute infringing on their right to get a fair and a proportionate punishment for an offence.
“Keeping a person aged over 85 years in prison under the harsh conditions when he is not a danger even to himself is something that should prick the conscience of humanity and our entire criminal justice system. It is tantamount to sentencing such a person to a slow death,” ruled Justice Mativo.
According to the judge, Parliament had the mandate to come up with laws, but it was the work of the Judiciary to give punishment to offenders on a case-to-case basis.
“Mandatory minimum sentences are the product of good intentions, but good intentions do not always make good policy; good results are also necessary. Parliament needs to ask itself, with respect to each crime, is justice best served by having legislators assign fixed penalties to that crime? Or should Parliament leave judges more or less free to tailor sentences to the aggravating and mitigating facts of each criminal case within a defined range?”
The judge questioned whether the Sexual Offences Act should prescribe mandatory terms or not.
“Judicial discretion is necessary for the proper discharge of court’s constitutional obligations. Time has come for Parliament to reconsider the provisions of the Sexual Offences Act, particularly on the question of taking away or limiting judicial discretion on sentencing,’’ ruled Justice Mativo.
The prosecution did not oppose Koskei’s release. It observed that he was unable to concentrate or answer simple questions.
It urged the judge to decide his fate as he was too frail to follow the case.
Justice Mativo quashed the sentence and ordered Koskei’s release, noting that his right to be fairly tried in a language he understood had been breached.
Why Sh437 million CCTV cameras in Nairobi are not workingUp to 42 CCTV cameras installed in key strategic places in Nairobi are not functional, a report has shown.
Opening Ceremony: Kenya takes her pride of place as 2020 Tokyo Paralympic Games beginTeam Kenya Paralympics strolled majestically into the Tokyo Olympic Stadium led by captain Rodgers Kiprop and Powerlifter Hellen Wawira for the Openin
Kipsigis Girls closed after students storm out of school
By Nikko Tanui
- Former minister’s cows attached over Sh888,000 debt
- Guards detained for seven days over death of teenage boy at Komothai Girls
- Chakwera: The Buruburu lecturer who became Malawi president
- MP, Khalwale differ over calls to support Mudavadi
- Matiang’i condemns Ruto rally disruption