× Digital News Videos Health & Science Opinion Education Columnists Cartoons Lifestyle Moi Cabinets Arts & Culture Ramadhan Special Podcasts E-Paper Lifestyle & Entertainment Nairobian Entertainment Eve Woman Travelog TV Stations KTN Home KTN News BTV KTN Farmers TV Radio Stations Radio Maisha Spice FM Vybez Radio Enterprise VAS E-Learning Digger Classified Jobs Games Crosswords Sudoku The Standard Group Corporate Contact Us Rate Card Vacancies DCX O.M Portal Corporate Email RMS
×

Lawyer Fredrick Ngatia faces JSC panel

COUNTIES
By Winfrey Owino | April 20th 2021
Senior Counsel Fredrick Ngatia at the Supreme Court building being interviewed for the position of Chief Justice. [Collins Kweyu, Standard]

Senior Counsel Fredrick Ngatia (pictured) is this morning being interviewed on his suitability to succeed retired Chief Justice David Maraga.

Ngatia has been involved in several groundbreaking cases at the Supreme Court, represented big companies, high-profile individuals and was the lead counsel for President Uhuru Kenyatta in the presidential election petition of 2013 and twice in 2017.

He has achieved top honours, and is now seeking to be the country’s next Chief Justice and President of the Supreme Court.

On paper, Ngatia almost looks like the most qualified candidate for the CJ’s position in terms of age, legal experience, academic qualifications, managerial skills, network and connection with the other arms of government.

The 64-year-old senior counsel has two Masters degrees and about 41 years of experience in the legal profession.

He was ranked the top lawyer in dispute resolution by the Global Chambers in 2019 and is remembered for arguing the case that resulted in the abolition of the mandatory death sentence.

Ngatia was admitted to the bar in 1980, a year after he graduated with a Bachelor of Law from the University of Nairobi.

Later on, he obtained his first Master of Law degree from the London School of Economics in 1984, during which he researched the boundary dispute between Kenya and Sudan, which culminated in the changing of the boundaries between the two countries to the current state.

Take a quick survey and help us improve our website!

Take a survey
Senior Counsel Fredrick Ngatia is escorted by Registrar of the Judiciary Anne Amadi when he arrived at the Supreme Court building to be interviewed for the position of Chief Justice. [Collins Kweyu, Standard]

 

The senior counsel started his career as a State Counsel at the Attorney General’s office in 1980 but resigned after seven years to start practising private law.

He was a partner at Kagia and Ngatia Advocates but broke away in 1996 to start Ngatia and Associates, a firm where he is the sole proprietor to date.

In 2015, Ngatia was appointed by former CJ Mutunga to help condemned prisoners serving death sentence and successfully argued the case which has seen more than 5,000 prisoners apply for re-sentencing after the court declared mandatory death sentence as unconstitutional.

His other outstanding case was in 2019 when he successfully argued on behalf of the Council of Governors over the dispute regarding the division of revenue.

 

Among the major writings that he submitted to support his application for the CJ and President of the Supreme Court is his thesis for his Masters at the London School of Economics on the legal difficulty of delimiting the Kenya/Sudan boundary.

A master of election petitions, he cited as his second example his submissions before the Supreme Court, which led to the nullification of the election of Wajir West MP over election malpractices in the 2017 elections.

Ngatia also presented the case where he represented an international firm over a dispute with the Kenya Bureau of Standards on inspection and testing of imported petroleum products and the dispute over the printing of new currency notes, which he successfully argued on behalf of De La Rue International.

 

Share this story
Rooney reacts to Jose Mourinho sacking
Tottenham Hotspur's decision to sack manager Jose Mourinho just days before their League Cup final against Manchester City is "crazy", former England
Hotel loses in Sh38m dispute
The hotel wanted the court to rule on the dispute on grounds that EPRA tribunal that could hear the dispute has no chairman
.
RECOMMENDED NEWS

Feedback