Head of procurement defends Waiguru from loss of millions
By Moses Nyamori and Roselyne Obala
| Jun 25th 2020 | 3 min read
Kirinyaga County Director of Supply Chain Management Joseph Carilus Otieno yesterday defended embattled Governor Anne Waiguru, saying she had no role in the tenders at the heart of her impeachment.
Otieno (pictured above) told the 11-member Senate Committee that the governor has no role in the awarding of tenders for various projects in the county.
He made the submissions when he was being cross-examined by Ndegwa Njiru, a lawyer representing the county assembly, who questioned a Sh50 million award to Velocty Partners Ltd.
The firm was incorporated in 2017 and, therefore, did not qualify for the 2018 contract that required five years of experience, the assembly had charged.
The assembly further questioned the roles Pauline Kamau and Gichira Wayne played in influencing tenders by sitting in various tender evaluation committees.
In his response, Otieno denied claims that Waiguru had influence in the hiring of the duo so that she could use them as conduits to award her allies contracts running into millions of shillings.
“It is not correct. The responsibility of forming an evaluation committee belongs to the county accounting officer. It is not true that the two were put in the position by the governor,” Otieno told the committee.
The officer told the team that Kamau only chaired one tender evaluation committee in 2017-18 and the subsequent fiscal year. She was not serving in any committee in 2019-20, he said.
He further told the probe team that Wayne was appointed in two committees in 2017-18. He also served in three committees in 2018-19.
“I can confirm that Wayne and Ms Kamau have never sat in one evaluation committee; they have been in separate evaluation committees,” he said.
“Once I recommend a full membership of the evaluation committee, I send it to the accounting officer for consent and subsequent approval. At that juncture is when a full evaluation committee is composed.”
Otieno added: "The documents I have presented portray clearly that we endeavour to ensure that chairmen are appointed after due diligence."
The assembly claims Waiguru awarded the companies Velocity and Velocty tenders illegally. But Otieno said the existence of the names of the two companies in the contractual papers was an error.
“I can confirm that the contractual company is Velocty. The issue of two companies was being pegged on a small typo, one with 'i' and another without, which was in one of the paragraphs in the contract. There aren't two companies as claimed,” he said.
He also fought off claims that the county awarded tenders for the installation and commissioning of an Integrated Management Information system to Velocty Partners for Sh50,691,565 when it was clear it did not qualify.
The MCAs had told the committee that the firm was incorporated in 2017 and was a year old when awarded the contract in 2018, yet it required firms with more than five years of operation and three audited accounts.
The assembly claimed the software the firm was contracted to deliver had been installed by the national government.
Otieno said Velocty clinched the tender as a joint venture with another firm that was incorporated in 2000.
Are we seeing early indicators of a financial crisis?
- Safari Rally: Traders bag mixed fortunes as fans rev up sleepy lake town
- More hunger on the way as food inflation goes past 28-month high
- Why Kenya had borrow to repay a Sh17b Chinese loan
- More women now take up leadership positions in firms
- Top oil marketers tighten dominance in first 3 months