Knut refuses to give no-strike guarantee
SEE ALSO :Bid open for tutors schemeThe union failed to commit that it would not call a strike in the event the orders were suspended. Instead, KNUT's lawyer John Mbaluto, said if the Employment and Labour Relations Court suspended its orders, it would mean that a strike notice issued last year shall take effect. He was responding to a concern raised by Justice Byrum Ongaya who wanted an assurance from all the parties involved that learning will not disrupted by the ongoing case. On the other hand, Teachers Service Commission ( TSC) lawyer Timon Oyucho said that the orders would have an effect of depriving children quality education. "Teachers can do as they wish without being managed," he said.
SEE ALSO :TSC to promote 6,000 teachersLawyer Oyucho argued that career progression guidelines are the implementing tool for the current CBA and that schemes of service which were reverted to by the court cannot be used. "The schemes of service do not provide that when you get a degree you will be promoted immediately," argued Oyucho. According to the TSC, the orders of the court also meant that teachers will not be supervised for a year. The court had ordered that TSC validates teachers appraisal by December 1, 2019 for roll out in January 2020. Lawyer Mbaluto for KNUT argued that the court had no powers to stay its orders as it had already pronounced itself. "You may have been right or wrong but it is for the Court of Appeal to determine. In effect, if you stay your orders, the status we will revert to is industrial unrest," he said.
We are undertaking a survey to help us improve our content for you. This will only take 1 minute of your time, please give us your feedback by clicking HERE. All responses will be confidential.