Kanyotu widow, firm battle over 500 acres
Alleged caveatAt the heart of the suit is an alleged caveat, issued by the family court, barring Kanyotu’s family members from selling his properties. On November 29, 2014, the court gave orders in favour of Kanyotu’s second wife, Jane Gathoni Muraya-Kanyotu, who contested the disposal of the former spy chief’s land. Marriot claims that by the time the caveat was being issued, the land had already been sold thus the order issued in favour of some members of Kanyotu’s family is inconsequential, null and void. This after advertisements warning buyers that the land could not be sold due to the caveat were published in the local dailies. “The said adverts were fraudulent and misleading and absolutely untrue since the plaintiff has, since purchasing the said parcel of land from Trendsetters Investments Ltd, been the lawful and legally registered owner of the same,” Nyiha said. Kanyotu died in 2008 leaving behind a massive estate comprising prime agricultural land and plots across the country. In succession battle documents contained in case number 1239 of 2009, the former spy chief is said to have bought at least 60 plots. Thirty-seven of the plots were in Kirinyaga County. Kanyotu registered the properties under four companies where he was the sole shareholder. Kangaita Coffee Estate Ltd had six properties while Kawakanja Ltd had one property in Limuru. Halfmoon Investments Ltd held eight properties. In the case that came up for hearing before court yesterday, Marriot’s director Abdul Dawood Hassan claimed that only 500 plots have not been sold to third parties. In his supporting affidavit, he argued that the land’s title and agreements have been transferred hence the family cannot lay claim to the land. “The defendant, on oath, confirmed to the court that indeed the said Kangaita Coffee Estates Ltd had sold the said parcel of land known as LR No. 11261/76 to Trendsetters Investments Ltd, and that the estate of the late James Kanyotu did not have any claim against the said Trendsetters Investments Ltd or any person to whom Trendsetters Investments Ltd had sold the said land, that is, the plaintiff herein,” said Mr Dawood. The firm wants Kanyotu’s family, their company or agents to be barred from interfering with the land.
We are undertaking a survey to help us improve our content for you. This will only take 1 minute of your time, please give us your feedback by clicking HERE. All responses will be confidential.